Quote Originally Posted by pushin_tin View Post
OP is more likely to get banned for (inadvertently) naming the obvious hacker than the hacker is for actually hacking.
Honestly, that's what we need around here. I get that it's against the forum rules, but fact is, people are getting away with it because we're all forced into silence AND clear, obvious evidence is discredited on the possibility of it being edited. First, no one's that good. Second, IF the evidence were faked, that person just submitted a false report, and would only get themselves in trouble.

I'm sick of watching the same people we KNOW are cheating just get away with it because we're all supposed to play nice and not tattle. Screw that, I'm paying for this and can't even get a little timely customer support for an issue that's been going on for over 2 years already? Nah man.

Name them. Name them all. Their $15 isn't more important than mine, especially not when I'm actually abiding the rules.