Problem with reward structure

[Gravton]

To op. I thought you were going another way with this. I was sooo disappointed when I logged on today. Where are the rewards? Another 100 win mount and a music scroll? That's it? No new pvp armor? Items? Furniture? Anything to sink wolf marks into? Small "balance" changes and the "materia provisioner" still has that name but offers no materia. It's no wonder the community thinks pvp is a joke. Rival wings wasn't even put on the challenge log. Why did they up the amount of pvp exp. if it means absolutely nothing?

[Rufalus]

To op. I thought you were going another way with this. I was sooo disappointed when I logged on today. Where are the rewards? Another 100 win mount and a music scroll? That's it? No new pvp armor? Items? Furniture? Anything to sink wolf marks into?

That too. Well I think rewards for personal contribution in addition to team success would have helped, but yes more wolf mark things would've been nice too. I feel like we used to get wolf mark gearsets more often in the past. It may sound cynical but rewards are a huge part of why people play, like if you removed gear pieces from savage raids then people wouldn't do them nearly as much.

[Wintersandman]

Rival wings wasn't even put on the challenge log.

It is there.

New challenge log entries have been added.

Prepare to Dice
Participate in 10 Astragalos campaigns.
1,000 Wolf Marks

Luck Be a Lady Tonight
Lead your alliance to victory in 5 Astragalos campaigns.
1,000 Wolf Marks

MVP player announcement at the end of the match or something like "Best 5 players".
In some games there's also additional, like, 50% bonus rewards for top perfomance. (be it EXP, money or something)

How would you judge the MVP? I am going to use Shatter as an example. If I do X Damage to Players, Y Damage to Ice, Heal Z Damage, Score N Assists, or Score K Kills. Which has more weight?

I can already point out flaws in following this kind of methodology

[Zeonsilt]

How would you judge the MVP? I am going to use Shatter as an example. If I do X Damage to Players, Y Damage to Ice, Heal Z Damage, Score N Assists, or Score K Kills. Which has more weight?

I can already point out flaws in following this kind of methodology

Pretty hard to do something like this in FF XIV due to "Tank/Healer/DPS", it's not MOBA or FPS ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That guy wanted to know how other games reward players.

That answer also applies to some MMORPG, like Dragon Nest for example. When there's no Tank-Healer-DPS thing, it solely looks at your perfomance in kills/damage dealt and sometimes "hold the objective".

[Wintersandman]

Pretty hard to do something like this in FF XIV due to "Tank/Healer/DPS", it's not MOBA or FPS ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That guy wanted to know how other games reward players.

That answer also applies to some MMORPG, like Dragon Nest for example. When there's no Tank-Healer-DPS thing, it solely looks at your perfomance in kills/damage dealt and sometimes "hold the objective".

Totally understood. I was curious if you actually saw a way to make it work because I couldn't think of a logical stat weight to judge it on.