Open world PvP Zone

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

They go with what the majority of players desire - and right now, an open world PVP is not it.

Anyone can debate in support or dissent on forums. I gave my feedback.

You're right. You have the right to speak up as much as anyone else.

What I, and many other PvPers hold issue with is the fact that People who don't or won't PvP at all are speaking about changes and what they do/don't want to see regarding PvP and SE simply looks at them as a majority view and makes terrible changes as a result. Look no further than the 4.0 changes; no one who PvPs regularly asked for any of those changes, and yet what we enjoyed - without bothering or forcing on anyone - has been changed for the sake of making a mass appeal to the playerbase that shunned and avoided it in the first place.

Now ask yourself, would you be fine if things were the other way around? If I perhaps didn't like and avoided PvE content that much and felt I deserve to comment on changes to it, even though I still wouldn't touch it. Would you be okay with SE going "Hmm, this is what the majority thinks, so let's go ahead and change it"?

[Divinemights]

I do play the frontline considerably but I am against the idea of open pvp. System wise, it will always be bard/ machnest trimph under current balttle system. It is boring and pointless.

[uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweugwemu]

I do play the frontline considerably but I am against the idea of open pvp. System wise, it will always be bard/ machnest trimph under current balttle system. It is boring and pointless.

I've seen many good SAMs too lately. And no, healer still OP if it's 1 vs 1. Open world provides mechanism for NINs for more ambush, they can have 1-2 mobs for suiton on the road/go.

[Kisagami]

Now ask yourself, would you be fine if things were the other way around? If I perhaps didn't like and avoided PvE content that much and felt I deserve to comment on changes to it, even though I still wouldn't touch it. Would you be okay with SE going "Hmm, this is what the majority thinks, so let's go ahead and change it"?

Yes, I would be okay with it. I wouldn’t have a choice. There are so many other games to play, I could very well find another that would fit what i want to play. I don’t ask for thinks that would ruin the community feel of the game, and I’m stating what I feel would preserve what I love about the game. Other people can too. That is the beauty of free speech. And SE can take each person’s account as they’d like.

You have a right to voice your dissenting opinion to mine. But I’m not budging on mine just because you don’t like it and want to guilt me into silence just to get your way. I don’t like these proposed chances. I have experience in games where such a proposal ruins the game atmosphere.