Open world PvP Zone

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

THIS. People would wanna be there just for the Beast Tribe quests and fates and we wouldn’t be able to because of gankers.

It's worth noting that they likely wouldn't put any "necessary" PvE content in an area designed for PvP. People want it so separated, so it likely would be. That said, if anyone stepped in without the intent to PvP, they would likely have ignored any notifications that it's a PvP area and would thus be responsible for themselves in that regard. Might sound cruel to say that, but then I think it's selfish that someone's PvE-centric reason to step into a PvP area should hold more precedence. Would you not agree?

I can only get behind this unless there is no storyline plot part of the area. If it is just PVP, I’m good, as I won’t feel the need to go there ever. Storyline needs to be kept PVE.

And why is that? Because people insist on the limited idea that "this is a PvE game"? Even Yoshi P has wanted to utilize PvP in a main scenario instance before (yet noted the players' general reactions to PvP being reason why he wouldn't). Way to hold the game back. . . And yet, the Nadaam, which so many loved and enjoyed is LITERALLY Seal Rock (Seize) with one objective instead of many.

Why do people act like it'd be so horrible to play against someone in a multiplayer game? Don't say it's cause of the battle system; it was a hell of a lot better back when people didn't want to try it. Story? People fight each other in the story. Eorzea is not a perfect utopia. Grand Companies train against each other both for the sake of a land dispute, and as joint training exercises (that is EXACTLY the Frontlines lore). The Warrior of Light isn't a pacifist. You've hurt and killed people. People have hurt and tried to kill you. It's part of your life as an adventurer. Why then is it suddenly so different, so taboo when it's another person who plays the game?