Results 1 to 10 of 83

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Levan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    21
    Character
    Joachim Harvey
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by SyzzleSpark View Post
    Xeno conveniently left WAR out of the balance equation when talking about DRK, and went on a long tirade about DRK having inferior utility to BOTH tanks, and that low utility should be balanced by higher personal DPS, and then in his closing paragraph on that segment, stated specifically that DRK should deal higher damage than only PLD (omitting WAR from the statement altogether).
    Here however, he conveniently says that DRK should have more DPS than PLD ONLY. He mysteriously neglects to mention WAR. So, essentially he is saying DRK and PLD should be balanced with eachother, but WAR should bring more DPS than both, while also having more utility than DRK.
    well.. cant have war which is xeno's trademark to be 2nd in tank dps rank no? basically he wants for more buff to war, and fuck paladin back to where it belongs in 3.xx and make drk no 2 again.

    war logic
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    DaulBan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    282
    Character
    Daul Ban
    World
    Ultros
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Levan86 View Post
    well.. cant have war which is xeno's trademark to be 2nd in tank dps rank no? basically he wants for more buff to war, and fuck paladin back to where it belongs in 3.xx and make drk no 2 again.

    war logic
    Gonna go out on a limb here and you believe in other interesting theories like chemtrails and the sham moon landing.
    (2)
    One day I'll be the MT mountain I want to be... But that day is not today. (As of Patch 3.2)

  3. #3
    Player
    Levan86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    21
    Character
    Joachim Harvey
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 80
    now my question is.. do you?
    (2)