You're misrepresenting my argument to advance your own.

What you are hearing me say is that what I want DRK to be pretty much the best tank, because we make sacrifices in a few key areas.
Which you are doing yourself, on the very same sentences you're willing to correct me.

The fact is : I only take your sentence as litteral. You said yourself you don't think working more for the same results is fun to you, which cannot be solved by equality of performances between tanks with a different and harder gameplay for DRK. Which then means, if DRK has to sacrifice or pay, he must have greater rewards and greatest performance.

The point is : I don't have much of an argument here, except "Tank balance is a tiny thing people pay to much attention", you were hyperbolic during month for a less than 5% dispredancy with PLD, now due to warrior having grown to 5% more than PLD and thus, about 10% more than DRK, you're doing even more.


DRK is not fine, because his toolkit is clunky, incomplete, and lacks synergy. The balance of mitigation and damage is thin enough to be working, and could be tuned somehow else. But as your words were : "If it cost more, it should reward more" and not "If it cost a lot, maybe it just costs too much".