An antecdote (or, in this case, antecdotal evidence) is anyone's personal experience being used as part of the reasoning for a specific decision. Based on your post I thought you might need that clarified. At one point you say something "isn't an antecdotal" because multiple people in this thread have had a similar experience. That does not change the fact that anyone telling a story about their experience without hard evidence to back it up (video, chat logs, whatever) is putting forth an antecdote.
Literally everything in your post (well, everything you put forth as a reason to not have ingame parsers at least - not the rude, snippy remarks you make at people) is antecdotal. They are a bunch of stories about you and your girlfriend.
Do you understand the problem with allowing antecdotal evidence (especially highly contested antecdotal evidence like yours) to weigh in to a discussion is? It can be made up. You can tell all the stories about parser toxicity you want - where is the proof? You don't have any.
You might argue that we take you at your word - okay, fine, but what about all the other people who are saying their experiences with parsers are very different from yours? If we take you at your word we have to extend the same courtesy to them. Now we have two opposing views that are both supposed to be true, that can't possibly be though.
Do you understand why all your stories are pointless yet? At least in the context of this discussion?
I would love to sit here and rip into this post and quote little bits of it where you were incredibly rude but I don't have enough charge left on my phone for that. I'm sure others will. You are on here insulting some of the nicest, most helpful people I've found on the internet and calling them rude for responding to you? I'm pretty disgusted by that, honrstly.
If you're getting so many negative replies to your posts doesn't it make you stop and think for even a second? That you might be wrong on at least some of this?
It should. You are. Please stop.