Built-in Parsers

[kikix12]

well seperating people into "no parser" and "parser" is not going to increase/decrease df times. people will use what ever is going fastest.

If a person doesn't want parsers but still will go into a parser queue, especially since the additional option should, normally, make the no-parser queue faster (people wanting parsers would be added to the no-parser list if their queue would take too long, but the reverse would not be true), then clearly they weren't all that strongly against it as some would make me believe. I am against open-world PvP, so I don't play open-world PvP. In games where there are open-world PvP maps, I don't go to those maps unless absolutely necessary, and even then, I play those games only if that's limited to the bare minimum. I just don't do stuff that I don't want to do. Why would others be any different, when they have the option not to do it?!

Also no one is ignoring anyone , but the pro parser people still trying to teach the no parsing people how much good a parser will do , without having the negative impact in mind

This whole thread is a suggestion about how to limit any POSSIBLE negative impact to the bare minimum, and there were multiple suggestions, the initial one in my opening post included, how to go about that. All those suggestions were nearly or completely ignored by the people that do not want parsers. Often they were twisted around (like happened with Taika's suggestion about making it limited to high-end content).

Yes, there were constructive posts from people that are opposed to the parsers. I want to make clear that I did not ignore them or "see what I want to see". However, that doesn't mean that all the points of the "pro-parser" group were contested, while I cannot remember a single thing from the "no-parser" group that was omitted. Heck, some of the "no-parser" groups arguments were responded to in a multitude of ways by multiple people, not just once or twice by a single person.

Yes its easy to ignore the negative stuff , when it does not affect yourself ^^ (neither u cant understand why people dont want parsers since people lack the understanding for it)

Whatever have made you think that it wouldn't affect me?! Of course it does affect me. I am actually as casual a player as they get. Heck. If parsers were limited only to high end content, then chances are that the parsers availability in them would be the only reason for me to actually start doing them, even then through all sorts of learning parties rather than clear ones, probably.

But you see, I look at both the bigger picture and the details. And I try to look from various perspectives. I may fail of course...but accusing me of being wrong on the basis of me not being affected and not knowing how it feels?! That's purely ignorance on your part, when I made myself quite clear where I stand in the early posts in this thread.

Like in real life , people will only start to care about something when they are affected from it.

If this would be correct, there would be no such thing as a "Crusade" or "Inquisition". People do a whole lot of butting in on another persons stuff, even if it doesn't involve them, just cause they feel like it. Politics, religions...stuff like that, which is normally banned on forums, are banned for the very reason that people have strong opinions on them even if they shouldn't matter to them in the slightest way at all.