Built-in Parsers

[Disappoint]

Thanks for proving my point lul.

[SDaemon]

Thanks for proving my point lul.

Nothing in Taika's response supports your comment. Your thanks is groundless.

[DeaconMoore]

Nothing in Taika's response supports your comment. Your thanks is groundless.

Taika called him out. Which was his point.

Only the suck players would random queue for the higher end content and their would be next to 0 PF groups for it not using the parser.

[Taika]

Taika called him out.

Called him out on what exactly? I asked him if he does the content the parsers are asked for, and then if he does, if he has had negative experiences in it with parsing. And asked that if he doesn't do the content, how would allowing parsers in that content affect him (because I can't see how it would). Can you please explain if he's unable to?

Only the suck players would random queue for the higher end content and their would be next to 0 PF groups for it not using the parser.

Are you claiming all players who don't use parsers are bad?

[DeaconMoore]

Called him out on what exactly?

Do you do any content for which this is being asked for, as in Savage, extreme primals or Ultimate?

In other words: Are you even good enough son?

Quit being dishonest, dense, and obtuse. Be honest. We want the parser in the fights so we can better see whose looking for that carry and get them out of our groups asap.

[SDaemon]

Taika called him out. Which was his point.

Taika asked genuine questions and Disappoint responded in a childish manner.

[Disappoint]

Taika asked genuine questions and Disappoint responded in a childish manner.

Loaded questions that don't offer insight of the topic at hand are far from genuine. Really not helping your case.

[Disappoint]

Nothing in Taika's response supports your comment. Your thanks is groundless.

I made a comment in which I noted the declining behavior of another game which allows tools similar to those requested in this thread. In doing so, I'm immediately accosted based on the content I choose to perform in. Take a tour of WoW's general forums for me. Find topics similar to this. It's apparent this happens to be the go-to reaction to those in favor of tools that enable division and toxicity; lash out at the those who aren't in support, as opposed to taking a look at the effects they have in the community, good or bad. It doesn't matter if self-contained to its own duty finder or groups, people will still find a way to use it for elitism, trolling, or best yet, demanding screenshots or proof of big numbers despite pulling green parses themselves to get carried in content that's easily pug'd.

[SDaemon]

snip

Accosted? She asked if you were doing the content that players partaking in that content are seeking parsers for. She then asked what experience you had with it and if not how it would impact you. Those are valid questions with no hint of aggression in them.

[akaneakki]

I like how 98% of the no parser people act like it's fine for people who parser is okay to harras others. It's not really, you just report them, that simple. Illegal or legal parser, you still do it.
Then the 98% people who actually think harrasing means ''get better, no we wont have you in the group because we get enrage because of you etc etc''. it's not harrasment. Yes there are people who will talk shit, but seriously if someone underperforms I would mostlikely ask them to look for a dps guide, rotations, openers and then try the fight again with the mechanics and try do it better next time. You know it's also ''harrasement'' to hold 7 people too right? Too many here act like we ARE OBLIGATED to do your shit, when we aren't. You want to clear or win? You try as much as you can like the rest. It's team work, not you sitting back and leeching.