Restrict Personal Houses to 1 Per Server!

[Keridwyn]

You know whats even more crap..Paying $18 to move to a low pop server cause housing was my #1 priority...Having my 3 houses for a year + watching 200+ empty plots for a year...

Hi, fellow person from Coeurl. We didn't have 200+ empty houses (unless you're talking right after 3.3 when they released more wards). Usually at any given time we had several Goblet smalls available and the occasional Lav Beds small. Now and again a medium or two would pop up and sit for a bit as one was demoed. Mist has been consistently full since about a week after 3.3. Did we have empty housing, yes, but it wasn't nearly as dead or available as you keep telling people it was.


I have nothing against multiple house owners but much like the demo timer getting added restricting the amount of houses a single player can own on any given server is one more way they can work within the existing framework and help more people. You're not getting punished because you didn't do anything wrong, just like folks who had their houses demoed didn't do anything wrong, it's just that change didn't favor you this one time. I do feel for you but you won't be the only one who loses out if this happens. If they could combat the house flippers better or if they would get rid of the broken limited wards system for dynamic wards or if they'd make instanced housing like apartments more attractive then we wouldn't be having this conversation but they keep telling us they can't (won't) fix the wards and add more attractive apartments.

We are working with what we've got and until they tell us significant change is coming this is a small change that will help combat house flipping and get a few more houses to people who don't currently have one.