[Request] Make Top100 & Top10 rewards account-wide

[Arthur_Gwen]

(I know it has been asked many times, yet it's even worse now)

Facts:
-Few players have 2-4 characters listed in Top100 the same data center
-6-9 alts on leaderboard everyday last month
-2-3 alts in top10 last three weeks (main characters also listed in top10)

Suggested solutions:
1-Take the highest ranking among all participanted characters, reward all characters(new characters included) in account. Reset all characters' rating besides the one with highest score before season ends (e.g. Last day/hour of the season)
2-Rating sharing for all characters in one account (not recommended)
3-Rating sharing for all characters in one data center (need more discussion)

Skilled players should be rewarded, but all players suppose to have the same chance of obtaining the prize

Players who competing for top 10 should also have the equal chance to obtain the rewards. There's no point giving top 10 prize to 7 actual players.

Rewarding problems need to be taken more seriously

-----------------------------------------------------------

Update: In case if they reset all alts' score and take the highest ranking to reward,
15 more spots will be available in top 100

———————————————————————————

Update in Nov: 14 alts from the DC, 16-20 alts in total if cross DC alts included

[Shirolumi]

I agree with this, seeing the same healer have 3 alts on top 100, while yes, I commend them for being good enough to get all of the characters up there, I feel like that is 2 spots that could go to other players.

[Arthur_Gwen]

Been asked too many times but got no response, so ppl just stopped asking

Noooo don't give up lol

[Arisato]

Been asked too many times but got no response, so ppl just stopped asking

Noooo don't give up lol

There was a response in the live letter. They believe that team registration would kill the needs for using an alt to climb or something along those lines. Still a pretty bad response though...

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

They also believed the chat restriction - and not implementing a change to Fronlines that people asked for for 3 years as well as the GARO event - was a reason more people began to PvP.

They ALSO believed that lifting GC restrictions might cause "moral degradation" of players. (It didn't.)

Not hard to see that, AGAIN, what they believe and what's actually true aren't matching up. . .

[Shirolumi]

Well I started doing Feast with the chat restriction implemented since I felt more comfortable that way. Also, ppl on JP datacenters PvPed lots even before GARO (And we know they pay more attention to JP community unfortunately). So I can actually believe them when they claim that that is the reason. And since they specifically mentioned chat restriction, when talking about more people queuing for PvP they probably mean the Feast.

[Mozusu]

For every person that tries to get into Feast by not having the ability to chat i guarantee there are also people who quit feast and get annoyed because they cannot say anything and the justification for why is you might hurt someones feelings or make them uncomfortable because they have to learn to deal with people having an expectation of them.

Yet we're allowed to vote kick people from Duty Finder for having an uncooperative playstyle or just being excessively incompetent

[Geryth]

Yet we're allowed to vote kick people from Duty Finder for having an uncooperative playstyle or just being excessively incompetent

100% double standard between PvE and PvP

[Arthur_Gwen]

100% double standard between PvE and PvP

I'm talking about ranked feast lol

If pve rules being implemented in ranked feast (vote abandon/kick etc) then the game completely broken
Furthermore, pve player base is hundreds time larger than pvp (even more if talking about ranked specifically), rules can not be set in the same way simply

[Geryth]

I'm talking about ranked feast lol

If pve rules being implemented in ranked feast (vote abandon/kick etc) then the game completely broken
Furthermore, pve player base is hundreds time larger than pvp (even more if talking about ranked specifically), rules can not be set in the same way simply

I'm not saying we should allow people to get kicked in PvP, I'm just pointing out that they have gone to such lengths to protect players' feelings in ranked Feast but in PvE not only can you berate your fellow party members with full chat capability, you can kick party members. Why care so much about the feelings of PvP players but give us tools to do more against a bad PvE performer than tell them to git gud?