WAR raid "UTILITY" (Tank Balanced achieved?)

[Azerhan]

@MyaValentine: I will not answer to all your points, Claire did that very well for me, and before all, I want to apologize, I was thinking you were really bored about everyone talking about DRK - english is not my native langage, and I surely miss some words or expressions that make me misunderstand.
But I want to reply about something:
"-first of all the concept of MT and OT is heavily outdate all tanks can MT and OT perfectly and you should be turning around to maximize damage. "
This, makes me very wondering about your vision of Tanks in FF.
What is your definition of MT and OT?
Their is the best definition in this game for MT and OT: MT is the player with the aggro of the boss. OT is not.
A tank isn't everytime MT or OT, they can swap during the fight.
And yes, every tanks can MT and OT, BUT! Some will do that better than others. That is the point now with the tanks in SB.
A guy in another has proved with a board of all tanks's cds that the DRK was the worst about Mitigation. Yes, even with TBN... And, in tank stance, DRK as the worst damages of the three. At this moment, why taking a DRK in MT instead of WAR and PLD?
Also, for OT, why taking a DRK - DRK is weak compared to the other. Yes, maybe it's not a lot in comparison with the PLD during HW, yes it's not really important for a tank to make 3k dmgs everytime but, if we are logic, we should take another tank than DRK for that too.
Another thing: while PLD and WAR has a great mitigation, DRK is not. So it's even more difficult to stance dance with it, and it's even harder by the fact Grit is a GCD with a cost of mana...

I don't hate DRK, and I don't hate the others two tanks. But DRK was my favourite tank during HW, and SE did to him the same thing that he did with PLD during HW, like they haven't learned from that mistake.