Thread: 4.1 - The emptiest patch yet.

Originally Posted by Rita1989

Go ahead and try and the MSQ takes 1-2 days to get through max its not what keeps people invested over an entire patch period

You're right. It's not like they're also adding

• A 24man raid,
• Ultimate Savage (to satisfy the absolute 1% players),
• New dungeon.
• New Custom Deliveries (for crafters).
• Ability to use your Adventurer Squadron to better level jobs you might want but are bellow 50 (god knows I have atleast 1 that I'd be glad to finally get outof the way)
• New EX mode primal
• New Beast Tribe
• And a new housing district (techniqly only opening it up for plot purchase)

Totally just the MSQ being added, yup yup

Originally Posted by Rita1989

3.1 failed because the content failed ultimately not that it was lacking

Tut tut. That's not the argument being made. Either stay on target, or know when to back down

Originally Posted by Rita1989

4.1 has 1 dungeon. 1 raid, ex primal, ultimate, beastquest and pvp in 4.15(in 3.0 we got new pvp mode before 3.1)

And here we go. Hard proof that you're incapable of seeing beyond what might give you that oh so precious ilevel boost.
Or you wouldnt have omitted the....

• Hidlibrand sidequests,
• Shirogane being released to the public
• and new Stormblood tiered Custom Deliveries

Originally Posted by Rita1989

3.22 is a partial patch

A patch is a patch.
Your entire point is 4.1 will add the least ammount of content to the game ever outof any patch, both past and present

You did not say major patch. You did not say partial patch excluded. You did not say story/raid/etc patch only.

Hence, 3.22 says hi to your rather blatant case of hyperbole.

This is why I gave you the opening to rephrase. And it's why I had two examples, to counter both the litteral, and non litteral meaning of what you said.
I'd advise you to next time not spit in peoples face when they're trying to be nice

And I have no idea why you even mention 3.2, to then go on and adress 3.1 due to it being the one I actually mentioned.
Slip of the tongue, or ill concieved attempt to divert from my counter argument?