Quote Originally Posted by NinjaTaru72 View Post
If you read my other post you'd see I explained they have to say something that makes it seem like they are using one.

If they say something that Makes it seem like they are using one yes, I'll gladly file a report. If its false I'm sorry, but oh well, I'd rather file a report against someone who could be using one and potentially abusing players.

Now if they say something like "hey, I noticed your using this move before or after this other move, of you switched it you'd do more damage." then no, I won't report something genuinely helpful sounding like that.
Do you even read what you write? No, better yet, do you even comprehend what you write?

You're literally saying in that second line of yours that if it sounds like one, you'll report them and if they aren't using one anyways, too bad so sad.

As if the GM who's going to investigate your report is gonna be like "Oh well, clearly this player was acting cautiously by reporting just on something that sounded (YOUR WORDS, MIND YOU) like the other one was using a parser."


"Make it seem" is not good enough. Ugh!

If you cannot understand or won't understand that filing false reports against players is against the ToS, especially without PROPER chat log evidence, then I truly hope you do get flagged permanently as a report abuser.

I don't care who hurt you so bad with parser in the past; you don't knight templar your way into following the rules and expect SE to have your back.