Edda's outfit is available now apparently.

[Aylis]

Furthermore, people were asking for an equivalent item for male characters the whole time. Things requested by players with male characters have a habit of falling on deaf ears, it seems.

I do agree, for the life of me I don't understand why they couldn't develop an outfit with the similar dark theme and style and call it the Avere version and release that along side the Edda version. That could have been interesting and would have made lots more happy. I'm really starting to think SE doesn't really understand how cash shops work. Taking the fast easy lazy development way isn't always the best way when the end result is alienating half the players.

[Tracewood]

Well, guess I'll be seeing some 2B cosplays running around for the forseeable future. (Because of that dress and Samurai being the hot new DPS)

[NorthernLadMSP]

LOVE it! Thank you SE!

[Lacus-Clyne]

i dun mind pay abit more for dye-able actually.... next time we need to add "++dye-able" to glamours we request.........

[REPROBEAN_CHILD]

The scythe options seem a bit nonsensical to me. There's either going to be a conflict with animation or the blade won't be used. For instance, BLM and WHM will just use it as a staff; they're range jobs, so the blade is useless. DRG will just use the tip at the end, like it's a spear, not using the blade at all. The swinging animations of the WAR will make it look like characters are trying to to break the scythe, than using it as a weapon. DRK seems to be the only one to make sense with it, in terms of speed and range.

As far as the dress goes, it should be dryable. I'm also not sure about the "shiny" texture on it (I didn't exactly like it with Edda herself). It also seems like the eye patch is attached to the hat. I'm probably going to skip this one

[Niqote]

I'm happy to see the outfit is listed for a more reasonable price, its such a shame it is not dyeable though or I would have purchased it right away ^_^;

[dejiko_san]

I love it!

[NorthernLadMSP]

I'm super excited to see the month's of threads and posts from people whining because SE didn't make a flowery, frilly, satin dress into a unisex glam.

[BillyKaplan]

But non-gender outfits don't include a femine dress.
It would be a blank unisex outfit

1. The level 60 AST AF set would like to say hi. The equivalent WHM set too, for that matter. And have you seen the Lore set for casters and healers? That ship has long since sailed.
2. That assumption is the core problem of this entire debate. Why does it have to be this way? There's obviously demand.

I'm super excited to see the month's of threads and posts from people whining because SE didn't make a flowery, frilly, satin dress into a unisex glam.

Oh right because of people like this. Never mind.

[NorthernLadMSP]

Oh right because of people like this. Never mind.

I absolutely love Aymeric's attire and Thancred's Modish attire (not to mention most of the male Garo sets are much nicer than the female counterparts), yet you don't see me crying on the forums because my female character can't wear them. I just accept it and move on.