Sigh... I said I was done arguing with you, but since you are insistent on saying that your definition of "disability" is the correct one....
A simple Google search of "disability definition":
dis·a·bil·i·ty
ˌdisəˈbilədē
noun
noun: disability; plural noun: disabilities
1. a physical or mental condition that limits a person's movements, senses, or activities.
- synonyms: handicap, disablement, incapacity, impairment, infirmity, defect, abnormality; condition, disorder, affliction
"my disability makes getting into bed a slow process"
2. a disadvantage or handicap, especially one imposed or recognized by the law.
"he had to quit his job and go on disability"Disability as defined by Merriam-Webster:
1. a physical, mental, cognitive, or developmental condition that impairs, interferes with, or limits a person's ability to engage in certain tasks or actions or participate in typical daily activities and interactions; also : impaired function or ability
2.
a (1) : an impairment (such as a chronic medical condition or injury) that prevents someone from engaging in gainful employment
(2) : an impairment (such as spina bifida) that results in serious functional limitations for a minor
b : a program providing financial support to a person affected by disability; also : the financial support provided by such a program
3. a disqualification, restriction, or disadvantage economic disabilities
4. lack of legal qualification to do somethingAnd, finally, your "definition" of what constitutes as a disability:"Disability" as defined by Oxford Dictionaries:
1. A physical or mental condition that limits a person's movements, senses, or activities.
2. A disadvantage or handicap, especially one imposed or recognized by the law.
Nowhere in any of the three definitions I provided (with sources) does it state that a disability has to be a permanent, incurable and non-treatable condition. My definitions include your Oxford defintion, which, lo-and-behold, there is no attachment to the end of it dictating that a "disability" is only that which can be considered incurable and non-treatable. Which brings me back to my original point that physical disabilities are not the only form of disability. Mental and cognitive disabilities count as well, and this includes things such as: phobias, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, eating disorders, somatoform disorders, learning disorders, personality disorders...the list goes on. Since you know so much about dyslexia, you should know that it is classified as a cognitive/learning disability, and is recognized by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition as a Specific Learning Disorder. All of the disorders listed in the DSM-5 are medically recognized conditions, and can be considered as disabilities, especially in the legal sense of the term.
I would also like to add that just because some of these disorders can be treated (e.g., with the use of medication and/or therapy) does not mean that they can necessarily be "cured". Some people struggle with anxiety disorders, mood disorders, phobias, etc., for the entirety of their lives. Does that seem "curable" to you? Or are the only disabled individuals the ones that aren't "cured" of their phobias and/or disorders the only considered truly disabled, where as those who are "cured" of theirs are not?
The fact that you continue to insist that only permanent, incurable, and non-treatable disabilities are the only kind of applicable disabilities is proof of your own ignorance. I would suggest you educate yourself on all the conditions that apply under the term "disability" before coming here to bash other's conditions, and insist that yours are more important than theirs.
The tools for you to solve the puzzle may not be in-game, but they are still there. Stop being so prideful and turn to others for help if you're struggling. Like Makasase said, just because you refuse to make use of the tools there (in-game or outside of it) does not mean that they are not there. And while we're on that topic, since you keep insisting there are in-game tools to provide for other's disabilities, let's return to the discussion of colorblind individuals. There is no colorblind mode implemented in-game for FFXIV. The only "colorblind mode" options are provided by external or third-party software. So please explain to me how SE and FFXIV are catering to colorblind individuals when there are no in-game tools implemented to assist them. While FFXIV does have in-game tools to assist deaf individuals (a simple glance at the Accessibility options under System Configuration shows that the only options are visual cues for the audibly impaired), it does not have tools to assist with conditions such as colorblindness.
The way a lot of people learn to live with and cope with their disabilities is to accept them, and find ways to go about their lives with the conditions--not demanding that they receive special treatment for them, or feeling like they are entitled to such special treatment more so over other individuals. Others with dyslexia have came to this thread and told you already that they had no issues with the simple, optional piece of content that was The Rising puzzle, yet you still continue to act as if you speak for the entire dyslexic community. You had troubles; that's okay. But perhaps you would do better to accept it and move on rather than come here and complain, whilst simultaneously attacking others that would be far more sympathetic to your cause if you weren't so abrasive about the entire situation, or if you didn't sit there and say that "your disability is curable and/or didn't involve a real place, so it isn't real and doesn't count as a disability."
I would suggest looking up the legal definitions for disability, as well as reading up on the plethora of information that is available out there regarding it, before coming here to preach about what a disability actually is.