Paladin too overpowered, nerf their damage output!

[347SPECTRE]

Well they did say they were looking into changing Shake it off in 4.1, so we just might see that for WAR at least. Hopefully some love for DRK as well.

[Syrus718]

I Wish People Would Stop Screaming Nerf And Just Enjoy The Dann Job That They Play.My Paladin is At 54 My Warrior is 70, So I Don't Care About What Other jobs Can do Better, I Guess I'm one of the Few who just enjoys playing whatever jobs I use... And Before you Start Talking endgame Know I Beat all Content Except 0s4 because I'm Not Really Pressed for it

[Syfurion]

Well they did say they were looking into changing Shake it off in 4.1, so we just might see that for WAR at least. Hopefully some love for DRK as well.

This concerns me a little, personally. It's a fairly niche button in the end, but I've grown rather fond of it.

Amusingly, Warriors in GW2 also have a skill called 'Shake it Off' which breaks stuns and removes conditions, but is an AoE shout that also cleanses those effects from nearby allies.

[Mycow8me]

This concerns me a little, personally. It's a fairly niche button in the end, but I've grown rather fond of it.

Amusingly, Warriors in GW2 also have a skill called 'Shake it Off' which breaks stuns and removes conditions, but is an AoE shout that also cleanses those effects from nearby allies.

I would come to love shake it off too if it really did remove everything except vuln/resistance/damage stacks. Even the confuse from lakshimi/directional marches/hysteria/frog/pig/etc... and other things that are not currently removable. That would not in any way make it OP and make it actually useful beyond niche content.

[Theodric]

I would come to love shake it off too if it really did remove everything except vuln/resistance/damage stacks. Even the confuse from lakshimi/directional marches/hysteria/frog/pig/etc... and other things that are not currently removable. That would not in any way make it OP and make it actually useful beyond niche content.

That would just screw with many mechanics and make balancing fights all the more difficult. Plus it'd easily cause a situation where groups deliberately recruit 1-2 WAR for the sake of cheesing specific mechanics. Much like how the infamous 'SKIP SOAR' came to be the norm for Zurvan EX.

[Mycow8me]

That would just screw with many mechanics and make balancing fights all the more difficult. Plus it'd easily cause a situation where groups deliberately recruit 1-2 WAR for the sake of cheesing specific mechanics. Much like how the infamous 'SKIP SOAR' came to be the norm for Zurvan EX.

I disagree, I don't see how that would cheese anything. It's easy to say that but you didn't even provide an example.

[Syfurion]

I would come to love shake it off too if it really did remove everything except vuln/resistance/damage stacks. Even the confuse from lakshimi/directional marches/hysteria/frog/pig/etc... and other things that are not currently removable. That would not in any way make it OP and make it actually useful beyond niche content.

Hell, if they made it break unbreakable shit like that, they could slap like 10 gauge cost on it, and I wouldn't even complain about it.
To be honest, the only real change I'd like to see for WAR (other than giving Bloodbath back, which I know is never happening), is I would like our 'DPS' combo (Eye/Path) to be higher potency than Butcher's Block. It's not even a large gap, it's 20 potency, total. 150/200/280 versus 150/190/270. Royal Authority is 160/240/360. Soul Eater is 150/250(390)/300(440). I feel like Storm's Eye/Path could be like 150/220/300 and not be an issue.

[eschaton]

SE balances things in mysterious ways, lol. At times you'd think it's all balanced around what the head honchos currently are playing.

PLD kinda deserved a little spotlight, that's alright.

[Yeol]

Umm.. I don't think so...
All tanks are currently balanced.

[TouchandFeel]

All tanks are currently balanced.

I've seen many detailed explanations for why the tanks currently are not balanced.

I would love to see more detailed explanations for why people think they are in fact balanced, as opposed to just statements not backed by reasoning.