Time vs. Reward, and The Feast Tickets

[ZanzhizExaverion]

I would like to see the Armor become available for tickets, as well as weapons.

As it stands, now that the PVP rankings are all solo queue, time vs. reward is being upheld. Getting top 100 is more feasible if you have far more time to pump into The Feast because rank loss is not proportionate to rank gain. You can no longer climb steadily with a team of 4, which the playerbase was far smaller for, so it was more condensed, and kept it possible of getting into the top 100 when it came to time vs. reward.

Keep the Full set of rewards for top 100, but allow players who don't have the available TIME to access the rewards from the top 100 per data center. If not immediately, at the end of the following season. Also, top 100... Why is it not per server?

Tickets allow me to believe that weapons are a permanent reward, which is nice, but being honest, spending that much time to get to diamond warrants more than a "portion" of a weapon.

[MisterAdri]

People who don't have time aren't available to progress through raid content like savage either. Do you see them ask to be able to buy o4s weapons with o1s/o2s tokens too?

[Rhinos]

People who don't have time aren't available to progress through raid content like savage either. Do you see them ask to be able to buy o4s weapons with o1s/o2s tokens too?

That is a very poor comparison. Unlike season 5, savage raid will always remain available. Armor from savage isn't limited to 100 players. Even casual players can eventually be able to complete it as ilvls get higher.

Even if SE made the armor available with tickets, casual players would still have to participate in multiple seasons to earn enough tickets to buy it. Instead of making the armor exclusive to the top 100, give top 100 the armor for free, but alternatively available with tickets. That still gives the top players several months of bragging rights, without locking it away from others forever, which is a bit extreme imo.

[Aqua_]

As it stands, now that the PVP rankings are all solo queue, time vs. reward is being upheld. Getting top 100 is more feasible if you have far more time to pump into The Feast because rank loss is not proportionate to rank gain.

Well, counting that every Top 100 will probably be full of Diamond players again, tier where you lose the same amount of points (or sometimes even more) than what you gain for winning a game, what you are saying doesn't really apply. Top 100 rewards are meant to be exclusive for the best players. If you want them, get good. It's simple. You don't even need so many games to get to Diamond.

Also, why would Top 100 be per server if you are getting matched against people in your DC?

[Cervios]

If youre not in top 100 get good? Sorry this feels far more like rng based wins depending heavily on how good/bad your healer is versus theirs.

[MisterAdri]

If youre not in top 100 get good? Sorry this feels far more like rng based wins depending heavily on how good/bad your healer is versus theirs.

I like how people blame their teams for not getting in the top 100, get good man.

[HeroLogarin]

I like how people blame their teams for not getting in the top 100, get good man.

It's not necessarily getting good, but how the team works. Yeah we get new players that are learning, but if the team isn't able to get at least 1 kill and maintain then you won't get the rating points to move up the board.

You can be the best tank or Dps or healer, but if that doesn't come together on the field then it falls flat.

[loreleidiangelo]

It's not necessarily getting good, but how the team works. Yeah we get new players that are learning, but if the team isn't able to get at least 1 kill and maintain then you won't get the rating points to move up the board.

You can be the best tank or Dps or healer, but if that doesn't come together on the field then it falls flat.

Idk, I see this same crap on the Heroes official forums/subreddit, and it's always the same garbage: "wah wah, I'm stuck in wood league where I clearly don't belong because I'M SOOOOOOO MUCH BETTER THAN THESE RUBES, I don't understand why I can't climb, it's my teammates' fault I'm stuck here, wah wah" and then when the person actually nuts up and uploads some replays you can see they have no clue about macro play, spam pings like a turd and play heroes they suck at because they're "meta".

It's not always the case, but someone on that same HotS subreddit pointed out a good idiom for this: "if everyone else on your team sucks, then it stands to reason that everyone else on the enemy team must suck too, so if you DON'T suck then that's 20% of your advantage right there. You can't just claim that only you get the bad teammates; that's illogical".

But the problem is that everyone always winds up with the bad teammates, and the enemy team always manages to get the diamond players on their alts for some strange, mystical reason~ (kappa).

[Kan-ji]

(Time) is not under the users agreement when starting this game nor is it a concern for SE, if you dont have time then thats not a valid reason to place such rewards as you proposed. Ive seen many players that dont have enough time in the day an still manage to get into the top 100 if you want proof look to past seasons like 4 and 3 and. Also concerning the 100 per world would give less quality to the reward and people will just sit on their rank more.

[abbas]

season last 3-4 months long dude. Rewards are repeated every 2 season.. you have almost 6-8 months in total for a shot at top 100. No time? you complain about "Time"? half a year is not enough? want each season last 2 years of expansions for you ?