What if MCH was a full blown pet class?

[Thunda_Cat_SMASH]

I'd probably drop it in a new York minute. Pet classes are rarely fun in games. I don't mind having more abilities to interact with said turret, but making it a pet? No thank you.

[Caitlyn]

Full pet class? No. Please not.

But I would like to have different turrets, guns and stuff.

An idea could be, that you can switch between different firearms as long as you have enough ammunition for them. You got your standard rifle for standard attacks. But you can switch to dual guns where you can do much faster attacks, but need to be in melee range. You can also use a grenade launcher for AoE-attacks, which consumes more of your ammunition. And you have a light machine gun, which uses all of you ammunition for a single, massive attack for 10s (like the flamethrower, but kinda different). Or something like that.

[RichardButte]

I'd probably drop it in a new York minute. Pet classes are rarely fun in games.

Beast Mastery Hunter and Warlock in WoW are both amazing pet classes, and SCH was amazing in 3.X before they gutted it.

[RiceisNice]

Beast Mastery Hunter and Warlock in WoW are both amazing pet classes, and SCH was amazing in 3.X before they gutted it.

SMN can hardly be considered a pet class in 3.0 though, considering that all of their new abilties in HW were not associated with the pet.

[Thunda_Cat_SMASH]

Beast Mastery Hunter and Warlock in WoW are both amazing pet classes, and SCH was amazing in 3.X before they gutted it.

SCH was OP in 3.X, and it wasn't because of their pet. It was because they could sit in CS all the time and spam DPS. SCH is pretty much the same as Symmetra in OW, a mislabeled job, where Symmetra's kit better suits a Defense hero but she's labeled a support, and SCH's kit better suits a DPS but it's labeled a healer, IMHO, in 3.X. Haven't played WoW.