Stacks to 999 timeframe?

[Frost_Trunks]

That seems more like an odd joke than a confirmation that they'll be changing stack sizes.

Yes, it seemed like it till the part that says:
(Yoshida)
Matsuno’s 4.1 text is currently being implemented! Please look forward to it!

[Felis]

Yes, it seemed like it till the part that says:
(Yoshida)
Matsuno’s 4.1 text is currently being implemented! Please look forward to it!

Question is, do Yoshida mean Matsuno's tweeter text or the stacks?

[Waliel]

I've a feeling the servers would implode if that happened.

[SaitoHikari]

I've a feeling the servers would implode if that happened.

I don't think the servers would, it'd be less item stacks for the servers to keep track of.

What would really implode is the market board as idiots keep selling stacks of 999 items instead of the usual 99 now.

[Frost_Trunks]

I don't think the servers would, it'd be less item stacks for the servers to keep track of.

What would really implode is the market board as idiots keep selling stacks of 999 items instead of the usual 99 now.

Oh lord I hope not. I think we should be able to have 999 on a person/retainer. but only sell in stacks of 99.

[Razor]

Oh lord I hope not. I think we should be able to have 999 on a person/retainer. but only sell in stacks of 99.

Or the easiest (and most intelligent) decision would be to just abandon the archaic mechanic of "Buy everything player X has for sale". I realize Yoshi had this dream of players being thoughtful about quantity vs price when putting things up for sale, but the playerbase is too lazy for that. If we could choose how much of something we wanted to buy, then we can list all 999 of an item for sale, and guess what, someone can only buy 1 or 10 of them if they want. All the current purchasing restriction does is hurt newer, poorer players who don't have the disposable gil to just buy a full stack of an item and resell the other 98 they didn't need.

[Waliel]

I don't think the servers would, it'd be less item stacks for the servers to keep track of.

What would really implode is the market board as idiots keep selling stacks of 999 items instead of the usual 99 now.

Obviously they wouldn't, but it's always servers this, servers that when Squenix shoots an idea down.

[MrSmiley]

I don't think the servers would, it'd be less item stacks for the servers to keep track of.

What would really implode is the market board as idiots keep selling stacks of 999 items instead of the usual 99 now.

I dont know... currently we are at a state that even a new face option in customization would supposedly send our servers to their fiery death...

[Frost_Trunks]

I dont know... currently we are at a state that even a new face option in customization would supposedly send our servers to their fiery death...

LOL True story. However, the last interview seemed to focus more on cost of development. Many times they referenced "We will have to see what it would cost to implement this" So it went from, it will crash the server to it's going to cost too much money to develop. Which, I thought was a little concerning.

[Laerune]

I hope they do with armour, weapon and accessory aswell (when the item is in the inventory) . Just separate them based on NQ and HQ.