About Savage Raid's loot rules, 1 / 2 chests

[Moxas]

So, from what i've been told, there's no actual way to find out if a person in the party already cleared the raid for the week and so we only get a single chest (which happened to me today)

Is there something being done about this? or are we simply have to endure the trolls if we'd PuG savage raids?

[Xellos2099]

Like i said before, there was warning before but it is removed. Nowsday the only we can do is to made leader set pf correctly or SE add the warning back

[Cabalabob]

Or remove the chest lockout and just make it so you can't lot if you already did it, I really don't understand the point of punishing people for running this with friends who already did it for the week.

[SendohJin]

Or remove the chest lockout and just make it so you can't lot if you already did it, I really don't understand the point of punishing people for running this with friends who already did it for the week.

it limits loot selling.

[HyoMinPark]

it limits loot selling.

Since the game already keeps track of if you've cleared since reset or not, they could still just lock individuals out from rolling if they have the clear, whether they rolled for the loot that dropped during their weekly clear or not.

[SendohJin]

Since the game already keeps track of if you've cleared since reset or not, they could still just lock individuals out from rolling if they have the clear, whether they rolled for the loot that dropped during their weekly clear or not.

that's already how it works.

[raelgun]

Or remove the chest lockout and just make it so you can't lot if you already did it, I really don't understand the point of punishing people for running this with friends who already did it for the week.

Yeah, 'friends' its designed also to limit boosting, as much as people think otherwise, SE still wants there to be a competitive progression treadmill at end game.

[HyoMinPark]

that's already how it works.

I'm talking about them keeping that system while not removing chests based off of the number of party members that have cleared versus those who have not. The system is already in place; why even bother with 0/1/2 chests. Can't sell loot if you can't roll on anything that drops after your initial clear. And if you're just talking about content sales in general, those already happen anyways. Regardless of number of chests.

Since the game no longer warns you of people that have already cleared, this would make it better on those who PUG clears and for statics that have to PUG a member if one can't make it.

[SendohJin]

Can't sell loot if you can't roll on anything that drops after your initial clear.

You mean you can't buy? Why can't you sell? My static and I cleared, 7 of us sell the all the drops to 1 person who hasn't cleared for a set price regardless of what drops.

And if you're just talking about content sales in general, those already happen anyways. Regardless of number of chests.

Outside of Savage yes. But Savage is special because it's the top tier of content.

Since the game no longer warns you of people that have already cleared, this would make it better on those who PUG clears and for statics that have to PUG a member if one can't make it.

Or they can put the warning back?

---

And I'm for relaxing the rule but not removing it. 1 or maybe 2 people who previously cleared should still be 2 chests, and 1 chest for 3 or 4 "helpers". 0 chests for 5+ helpers.

[HyoMinPark]

Outside of Savage yes. But Savage is special because it's the top tier of content.

People are already selling Omega Savage clears and runs. You're making it sound like they're excluded from such transactions, when that's not the case. .-. Anyways, if SE doesn't put the warning back in, they need to do something about the loot rule. If I'm solo PUGing, I wouldn't really expect loot, but if my static has to sub members, I'd rather us not be cheated out of a chest due to some player's dishonesty. Sure we have the PF to filter out such dishonest players, but still.