Request for Super Savage difficulty

[Thoro39]

A reasonable request. SE making it possible to unsync and clear SCOB Savage for titleglamours as a lv 60~70 group has completely diminished my and many other people's motivation in tackling these turns proper and truthfully, and I'd hate for the same to happen to the SuperSavage Fight in 4.1.
It defeats its entire purpose.

[Ametrine]

Source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...33546430776187

"By the way, we won’t be calling it “V5.0 (Savage)”. We are creating an independent battle, and we plan to make it into series. There is a name already decided for the series, and while I would love to tell you…I can’t yet! "

Thanks for the save, man. I got the info backwards (I though it WAS a V5.0!) but the sentiment still stands. It sounds like the devs are enjoying designing this thing~

But, actually, if that is the case, perhaps the SS fights are pulling from old fights akin to the Wandering Minstrel. Maybe Khloe's getting hardcore?

[Core1019]

Simply put, you would get nothing else if they opted not to do this.

Well, not quite. They'd get yet another braindead dungeon to spam in expert roulette for 3 months. They said only 1 dungeon on odd patches now so we can get new stuff instead.

[Lambdafish]

Well, not quite. They'd get yet another braindead dungeon to spam in expert roulette for 3 months. They said only 1 dungeon on odd patches now so we can get new stuff instead.

Thats not just super savage though, thats eureka, PotD, new unannounced content that Yoshi P keeps teasing, Lost canals, and anything else that they haven't mentioned (blitzball?), super savage in isolation is impacting basically nothing.

[Core1019]

eureka.

I keep seeing this name mentioned but still have no idea what it is. I can only assume it's not referring to the emote?

[Lambdafish]

I keep seeing this name mentioned but still have no idea what it is. I can only assume it's not referring to the emote?

It is a piece of content being released in 4.15 that we know very little about other than it is a zone of some kind and that it is tied to relic in some way

[Bourne_Endeavor]

I keep seeing this name mentioned but still have no idea what it is. I can only assume it's not referring to the emote?

From what has been mentioned, it's supposed to take inspiration from Diadem, but not be another Diadem? Yoshida has been incredibly vague. I suspect they wanted to do an upscale Diadem of some sort but the immense dislike of both iterations probably changed their plans. At this point, all we know is it'll be some massive zone separate from current content and it'll be where the relic takes place.

[LathusWHM]

It is clear that this is the intention for raiding, but my far bigger complaint was regarding the titles for SCOB (savage), and how that content was essentially wasted because you can just level sync and do the fight not as intended. My request is that for the super savage fight (coming out in 4.1) specifically, as this fight is clearly intended for the top end players, can we put in a restriction that this fight cannot be level synced, and that it has an ilvl cap, or at the very least have it so that this is the condition for obtaining any mounts/minions/glamour/titles that it may drop. It is too late for SCOB, but please keep super savage as something that statics can challenge throughout the games lifespan.

No No No No No No No No No No

[Core1019]

No No No No No No No No No No

There is literally nothing wrong with OP's suggestion. What do you disagree with?

[Paladinleeds]

I'd say for this, lock it to minimum item level, no undersized parties (or unsyncing), etc. And, if at any point you make even the tiniest mistake, the wipe happens instantly. Basically, every mechanic or lack of DPS = instant wipe. And it should be set so high that even the top 1% will take say 9 months to beat it. That to me would be super savage. I would also make the punishment to failure extend beyond the duty too, so say maybe charge 50k gil per person per attempt or something? Would make for a nice gil sink too.