Is Dissipation really that bad?

[ScorpiusO-Ra-E]

LOL. First paragraph you claim you haven't called anyone stupid, then immediately proclaims in the second paragraph that anyone who doesn't like dissipation must not be intelligent enough to understand SCH. Okay buddy. Also nice ego self proclaiming yourself an innovator...in a video game.

Again no words directly attacking anyone? Maybe have a conversation with your own ego about why you're so hurt over my very benign responses? Also yes you can innovate in a video game that's how guides and personal builds are created. Without innovation you'd still be using Adlo to heal all incoming damage rather than paying attention to your fairy, using rouse, whispering dawn and whatever else mitigation mechanics you possess.

[Jerichai]

People don't declare themselves innovators, they're recognized by their peers as innovators for their contributions. Most of the time those contributions don't include blindly dismissing opposing opinions that don't support their pet theory.

[ScorpiusO-Ra-E]

People don't declare themselves innovators, they're recognized by their peers as innovators for their contributions. Most of the time those contributions don't include blindly dismissing opposing opinions that don't support their pet theory.

What opinion about mp loss has been helpful to my overarching question? Please enlighten me. That would be like me saying I don't use Miasma II because in "certain" situations its a dps loss when in actuality it can be a dps gain if used correctly. Questions and inquiries are used to gain information not dismiss what has been given. If i was being dismissive I would've said something along the lines of "MP problems don't exist for scholar, we have energy drain, AF, and Lucid Dreaming." As opposed to an inquiry like: "Well what is leading you to these mp issues in the first place? Is there a workaround?"