Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 124
  1. #11
    Player
    syntaxlies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    uldah
    Posts
    4,043
    Character
    Syntax Lies
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Leatherworker Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by neorei View Post
    hello all,


    I don't know if this is the right forums to put this question in but I have like a graphic card inquiry.

    I have a AMD Phenom II X4 3.2 GHz processor, 8 gigs of ram and a GT 440 graphic card,550 Watt plug. I can play FFXIV all on standard with 30-35 FPS. I was wondering with what i got should I get a better graphic card? what would you guys suggest?

    I want to play this game on max, so (help me out)
    i have the same cpu and i overclock it at 3.8. if its black box edition you can overclock it easy.

    youll need a nice heatsink/fan if your gonna overclock though.
    (0)

  2. #12
    Player
    Thanos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    527
    Character
    Thanos Xiv
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Also you dont need more than 30fps, your eyes can only see max 30fps anyways

    You can google this
    (1)

  3. #13
    Player
    Zorlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    61
    Character
    Sol Ciel
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Although your cpu is still a pretty decent CPU and able to max most games with a decent card you wont be able to max FF14 with that CPU and get constant 60FPS not because the CPU is weak but because the engine sucks and cant share load evenly between all cores among other issues caused by bad engine code.
    Ive got an i7 2600k and dual 6950s and here are afew tests ive done:
    Test 1: i7 2600k(stock speed) only using one card(window mode) in city 48FPS~
    Test 2: i7 2600k(stock speed) and 2 cards in crossfire(fullscreen) end up with exacly same FPS this means cpu bottleneck
    Test 3: i7 2600k @ 4.5Ghz only using 1 card = 60FPS

    So yea you can see how bad the engine is when it needs a 2600k that is an high end cpu to be overclocked about 1.1Ghz to get 60FPS @ 1080p where in any other recent game with max settings i get 150fps+

    To all that say you dont need more then 30FPS thats true you dont but does it make a diference? YES HUGE the whole game feels alot smoother, ppl that say they cant tell the diference lie or have a problem with their eyes.

    My advice OC yr CPU abit although wont be able to cap FPS in some areas and get a 6950/560ti for a decent bump in performance since that 440 is kinda low end.
    Btw the new ATI 7xxx will be released in january.
    (0)
    Last edited by Zorlin; 12-21-2011 at 05:51 AM.

  4. #14
    Player
    nasomi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    644
    Character
    Pocket Hockey
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    I have played on above medium settings on a core2duo. Quad core should be fine with any gpu in it, as it's mostly gpu based. If your cpu gets taxed set physics to the video card instead of cpu. I started this game on an 8800GTS 320mb, then GTX280, ATI 6870, GTX580, now GTX580 x2. I have 2 other machines with core2duo's and gtx285's that play on medium settings. Don't cheap out on a psu, but you don't need to go with 1kw psu either. I have a GOOD psu(brand wise), pc power & cooling, only a "mere" 750w, that powers my entire system that has dual gtx580's, 2 ssd's, one regular hdd, cd-rom. Those PSU's run about $80 from their website.

    Here's my breakdown of GPU quality for nVidia:

    x40 Series - budget
    x60 Series - budget
    x70 Series - budget
    x80 Series - Great
    x85 Series - better
    x90 Series - Overpriced

    I would not even consider a gt440 video card, or gtx470, it's x80 or nothing for me. But each person has their preference.

    BTW the game looks super sweet on ultra high settings at 5760x1200 resolution...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zByk4YbR51M
    (0)
    http://www.pocket-hockey.com <-My ffxiv adventure!

    Now with nVidia Surround!!!
    MicroATX Desktop - i7 950 - 12gb ram - 2x GTX580
    2x Intel 520 180gb SSD's in Raid0 - 3x 28" LCD @ 5760x1200

  5. #15
    Player
    nasomi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    644
    Character
    Pocket Hockey
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Zorlin View Post
    Although your cpu is still a pretty decent CPU and able to max most games with a decent card you wont be able to max FF14 with that CPU and get constant 60FPS not because the CPU is weak but because the engine sucks and cant share load evenly between all cores among other issues caused by bad engine code.
    Ive got an i7 2600k and dual 6950s and here are afew tests ive done:
    Test 1: i7 2600k(stock speed) only using one card(window mode) in city 48FPS~
    Test 2: i7 2600k(stock speed) and 2 cards in crossfire(fullscreen) end up with exacly same FPS this means cpu bottleneck
    Test 3: i7 2600k @ 4.5Ghz only using 1 card = 60FPS

    So yea you can see how bad the engine is when it needs a 2600k that is an high end cpu to be overclocked about 1.1Ghz to get 60FPS @ 1080p where in any other recent game with max settings i get 150fps+

    To all that say you dont need more then 30FPS thats true you dont but does it make a diference? YES HUGE the whole game feels alot smoother, ppl that say they cant tell the diference lie or have a problem with their eyes.

    My advice OC yr CPU abit although wont be able to cap FPS in some areas and get a 6950/560ti for a decent bump in performance since that 440 is kinda low end.
    Btw the new ATI 7xxx will be released in january.
    I'd find it super hard to believe that the i7 2600k is a bottleneck of ANY sort, being that I have an i7 950 and have maxed everything, including DoF and AO, with dual gtx580's, and ran 60fps solid. Check your cpu usage while playing, guarantee it's not 100%, unless you're doing something horribly wrong. I even have physics set to CPU and have never seen the game go over 20% cpu usage regardless of the situation.
    (0)
    http://www.pocket-hockey.com <-My ffxiv adventure!

    Now with nVidia Surround!!!
    MicroATX Desktop - i7 950 - 12gb ram - 2x GTX580
    2x Intel 520 180gb SSD's in Raid0 - 3x 28" LCD @ 5760x1200

  6. #16
    Player
    nasomi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    644
    Character
    Pocket Hockey
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by nasomi View Post
    I'd find it super hard to believe that the i7 2600k is a bottleneck of ANY sort, being that I have an i7 950 and have maxed everything, including DoF and AO, with dual gtx580's, and ran 60fps solid. Check your cpu usage while playing, guarantee it's not 100%, unless you're doing something horribly wrong. I even have physics set to CPU and have never seen the game go over 20% cpu usage regardless of the situation.
    I've also never overclocked my CPU because it has never once gone over 50% usage with any game I've played, or anything I've done.
    (0)
    http://www.pocket-hockey.com <-My ffxiv adventure!

    Now with nVidia Surround!!!
    MicroATX Desktop - i7 950 - 12gb ram - 2x GTX580
    2x Intel 520 180gb SSD's in Raid0 - 3x 28" LCD @ 5760x1200

  7. #17
    Player
    Zorlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    61
    Character
    Sol Ciel
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by nasomi View Post
    I'd find it super hard to believe that the i7 2600k is a bottleneck of ANY sort, being that I have an i7 950 and have maxed everything, including DoF and AO, with dual gtx580's, and ran 60fps solid. Check your cpu usage while playing, guarantee it's not 100%, unless you're doing something horribly wrong. I even have physics set to CPU and have never seen the game go over 20% cpu usage regardless of the situation.
    The game taxes one of the cores yet overall cpu load is 20% nothing you can do about that the engine sucks and cant pass the load to other cores so you get a bottleneck. And i really doubt you have 60FPS solid with everything maxed in uldah for example or a 40ppl raid in natalan.

    Look at each core usage graph not at the overall load also you can see which thread taxing that core in this case it was ff14 related.
    (1)
    Last edited by Zorlin; 12-21-2011 at 06:05 AM.

  8. #18
    Player
    Coldfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,130
    Character
    Nero Coldfire
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    I have a Phenom II with 6 cores @4.0Ghz, 2x HD5870 and set the fps limit to 30 anyway since this laggy piece of failcodegame doesn't need 60fps at all. Do your hardware a favor, set it to 30fps and don't set general drawing higher than 8 (instead use SSAA or MLAA if you really want a smooth image).
    (0)

  9. #19
    Player
    nasomi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    644
    Character
    Pocket Hockey
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    I always look at individual cores, and it's generally balanced relatively well among the first 4, none of which exceeding 50%. Maybe the sticker said i7 2600k, but the processor in side is not, if you are getting capped cpu, which you never mentioned, merely saying that it must be the cpu if your framerate doesn't chagne. Have you looked at the cpu when comparing single vs crossfire? Perhaps you don't have a multi-gpu profile loaded? Are both cards being loaded when you play in crossfire? do you have gpu monitoring that tells you how heavily they're being used?
    (0)
    http://www.pocket-hockey.com <-My ffxiv adventure!

    Now with nVidia Surround!!!
    MicroATX Desktop - i7 950 - 12gb ram - 2x GTX580
    2x Intel 520 180gb SSD's in Raid0 - 3x 28" LCD @ 5760x1200

  10. #20
    Player
    Zephir's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    156
    Character
    Nyan Lmeowin
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 60
    GT440 is the "problem"

    grab a 460/560 or a 5770/5850 and you can achieve what you want...

    Your processor is fine

    BTW 2600k can't be a bottleneck

    ATM I have a @4700 mhz 2600k becouse on this PC i usually try benchmark and other..but with stock 2600 k i don't have problem of bottlenecking (on a 590) or on other setup
    (1)

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread