Is anyone else dying to get to Garlemald?

[Alleo]

Well, after all this, i'm not moving from my original point, I would like to enter Garlemeld, but not as some conqueror. The semantics are just depressing and just make me not want to play.

Oh, that'd feel great.^^

Not to sound mean but you are against conquering Garlemald because that would be horrible but yet you would feel great if you could go over to the side of the empire and conquer the world?

This is not meant as an attack but really curious how its not okay from one side but fine from the others?

[Kallera]

A combination of grievance and annoyance with the changes of the setting and the character. If we destroyed the Garlean state, the world would seem flat to me, reduced to republics and all kowtowing to their destructive savior. I've argued for the beast tribes when they were summoning primals and people called for their destruction. It's not really resolved, just a thing that's there but ok because the Warrior of Light is around. And its proving no better as we continue to be the Warrior of light. I've had enough of empire destroying and regime change while realizing that all of this is impossible for normal folk, and simply because your character is special. I'm sick of single note stormtroopers being lined up as fodder. I'm tired of chaos being labeled as easy and faultless to inflict as unkillable beings from nations that do not, and cannot change.

If I'm going to play as the person forced to do things with coworkers they does not gel with in a game that, at times, feels akin to work without end, then sign me up for the baddies.

Otherwise fine! Have your war, but destroy it all.

tdlr: My sense of disbelief for eorzea and my character is broken. It is not a question of morality, when you are taken out of the setting and just stop caring for the day you are brought back.