I mean, it's pretty clear that you're just going to claim that Garlemald is without any redeeming qualities and deserves to be wiped out because, in your biased mind, it resembles 'Nazi Germany'. So I'm not even sure why you're engaging in the first place, if I'm honest.

There's also a lot of irony in criticising a nation for resorting to genocide only to propose it as a solution yourself. Garlemald only came to resort to such measures because its people were persecuted and pushed around. If that had not happened then we would not have seen it's foreign policy become so harsh. Even then, you fail to acknowledge that Zenos was working against the better interests of his homeland and was written off as a monster by his own father.

Yet that doesn't fit your narrative, I guess.