Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Player
    Jade3173's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    139
    Character
    Ayis Luola
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Rubiss View Post
    It's fine to be weak in a 50 roulette. After all, it's fine for SCH to not have a spammable AoE at all. Every class is awkward at certain levels. Only some classes have that awkwardness go away however.
    please go create a "make SCH better thread" rather than just go on about how bad it is. Yes, we know SCH got nerfed and that you can no longer spam Blizzard 2 in dungeons. What Mitisuki is saying though is that at lv50 SCH (wait for it) has some actual AoE damage. In this game where DPS is king and as a healer if you have downtime you need to be doing damage, it only makes sense that AST should get a form of AoE for the Lv50 dungeons just like the other healers.
    (2)

  2. #12
    Player
    LegoTechnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    431
    Character
    Seolla Viltara
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Rubiss View Post
    It's fine to be weak in a 50 roulette. After all, it's fine for SCH to not have a spammable AoE at all. Every class is awkward at certain levels. Only some classes have that awkwardness go away however.
    This isn't necessary. AST at level 50 is terrible, even moreso now with their reduction to a single DoT. AST has in fact always been terrible in 50 roulette, and I can hardly stand it. While SCH is nowhere near as active as they once were at 50, AST is still far worse in this particular level sync situation. There's no sense denying it, so let them bring it up without derailing the thread into the 60+ roulette territory.
    (2)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2