Remove Frontline experiece NOW - Group majority of bots

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Here's the problem with that line of thought:

The moment you start shuffling your players into levels of importance based on whether a majority or a minority, you start down a very slippery slope. . . Say they did just get rid of PvP because the playerbase for it is a minority. What's next?

Not a lot of MCHs and ASTs, so they can go right?
Not many people play Roes. They can go, right?
Savage raiders? They're a minority still. They can go.
Balmung and Gilgamesh are full! Oh no! Meh, it's just 2 servers out of all of them. Whatever, right?
Hmm. . . only a few players have houses. Oh well! Housing is fine!

See where I'm going there?

Now, your little tantrum aside, I don't agree with a lot of PvP-related decisions they've made. That doesn't mean I hate PvP in this game. In fact I love it enough to actually TRY to be heard. I love it enough to teach other players who are interested rather than perpetuate the going misconceptions that have largely hindered its growth (even despite SE's missteps with it) these last 4 years. Your statements make it clear that you really don't know of which you speak when it comes to PvP. But hey! SE doesn't care, you don't care, and the "average" player just wants to log on and enjoy themselves, but PvP's not enjoyable?

Then why are so many of these "average" players PvPing now, and defending having XP in PvP? I mean, it's not enjoyable right? They could be running dungeons, or PotD, or doing fates; you know, anything more fun than that awful PvP that gives less XP than those anyways, right?

Now then, I do strongly recommend you actually read up on a few topics in the PvP section before trying to make a rebuttal. Might I recommend the almost year old "The New Chat Restriction In The Feast" where it took them 3 months and 40 pages to then ask for suggestions and feedback - all of which comprised the first 39 pages? Or perhaps all the ones about players wanting them to do something about the bots and wintraders, both of which have still gone unanswered? Or maybe the one where they admitted "Whoops! We didn't have enough time for balance changes before Season 5, but we're starting it anyways! Please give us your feedback for necessary balance changes"? (Spoiler Alert: Almost none of that feedback went into the balance changes at that time.) How would you love that approach to something you like in game? How would you love someone to come along and say "Whatever! SE doesn't care, I don't care, so it's not a problem! I trust their decision!" (Despite the fact that they don't care, right?)

Rather than trying to defend weak points with even weaker reasoning, read up and be a bit more informed about what you're trying to chime in on like that one person said.