Hunts. the tiger and the out of hand early pulling.

[Ragnhar]

I'm sure everyone by now as been annoyed by early pulled hunts, less than 1 min after they where first announced, this is specially annoying on ARR hunts as even S ranks die within seconds of being pulled. What i'm trying to say that maybe that stupid tiger mount shouldn't be linked to something that requires other people to not be douchy so you can get it, maybe that way all the cancer that hunting has become can find a cure.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

If theres enough people that it died in seconds, its not an early pull. just sayin.

[Tsumdere]

If theres enough people that it died in seconds, its not an early pull. just sayin.

ARR S Ranks can be killed with 2-3 people in around 10 seconds.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

ARR S Ranks can be killed with 2-3 people in around 10 seconds.

Then i doubt 50 will be able to get full credit. Just makes my point stronger lol

[Nixxe]

ARR S Ranks can be killed with 2-3 people in around 10 seconds.

This seems like a pretty obvious exaggeration. They live longer than 10 seconds on Balmung and there's definitely more than 2-3 people attacking them then.

[Kosmos992k]

If theres enough people that it died in seconds, its not an early pull. just sayin.

I agree with you so much on this, I cannot express enough agreement with mere words. Have all my +1 for the day.

Plus, there is no such thing as an "Early Pull". There are ambitious puuls, optimistic pulls, and stupidly suicidal pulls, but I've yet to witness an early pull, must be something someone made up.

iirc, didn't they said that hunts are first come first serve basis? No rules about it, if ppl want to be 'good willing' if you could say, they can, but there is no restriction what so ever on hunts.

SE's word is that there is no such thing as an "early pull", it's 1st come 1st served, if you have the capability to kill the mark, do so, if not, and you pull it, I hope you set a decent home point. This nonsense about community standards and waiting for world + dog to show up is an artificial construct that certain groups of players are trying ti impose on the content because they want to maximize *their* chances of obtaining the special mount from completing a large number of hunts. It's selfishness masked in the garb of selflessness.

[RubenSnizzle]

iirc, didn't they said that hunts are first come first serve basis? No rules about it, if ppl want to be 'good willing' if you could say, they can, but there is no restriction what so ever on hunts.

[kattzkitti]

iirc, didn't they said that hunts are first come first serve basis? No rules about it, if ppl want to be 'good willing' if you could say, they can, but there is no restriction what so ever on hunts.

Squeenix's official stance is that all hunt content is free for all, first come first served. If a player (and their group, where applicable) believe they are capable of handling the given target, they are fully free to pull at their own discretion. This whole "relaying the <pos> through hunt shells" thing is a purely player-driven phenomenon, Squeenix has said on multiple occasions that it "goes against the spirit of the content" and thus they frown on it (although they'd never actually step in and stop it, for obvious reasons).

"Early pulling" isn't a thing, has never been a thing, and never will be a thing. If you weren't there when it was pulled, you were late and your impotent rage is laughable.

[Charlayy]

Well said.

[Niqote]

They made a mistake linking a popular and unique mount to hunts.

As if we didn't have enough incentive to try get gold on hunts (Cracked Cluster, Verity, Allied etc), now no one gives a damn as long as they get a +1 to the achievement; which means bronze is fine so pull away!