SAM out classing all other DPS

[Draven]

snip

At what point have I said I don't agree they should have good dps? Not once did I say nerf them here. I said...you know what, fk it. This is ridiculous.

"You're here, so I'd say yes." right back at you.

[Ryaz]

At what point have I said I don't agree they should have good dps? Not once did I say nerf them here. I said...you know what, fk it. This is ridiculous.

"You're here, so I'd say yes." right back at you.

No, you just started arguing semantics with people about dps having "rights" to deal good dps. No one was implying that Samurai should be the best overall DPS class, but that should have the best personal DPS because they bring nothing else.

You bring their DPS down to match other classes and they're suddenly the most useless DPS class because they bring nothing else to the table.

[Janhyua]

No, you just started arguing semantics with people about dps having "rights" to deal good dps. No one was implying that Samurai should be the best overall DPS class, but that should have the best personal DPS because they bring nothing else.

You bring their DPS down to match other classes and they're suddenly the most useless DPS class because they bring nothing else to the table.

some one who understand the logic of utility and no utility

[Draven]

No, you just started arguing semantics with people about dps having "rights" to deal good dps.

Uh huh...except she didn't say good dps, she said

by all rights it should be strongest. Personally I'd like Sam still to be on top

Why are you defending someone who's bias says that SAM should be the most powerful dps of any out there? Probably because you're bias as well with your lvl 70 SAM. You blatantly ignored her saying that as you claimed previously that no one is saying that, and then still refer to her in your latest reply.

It's not semantics, it's what is being said by her and others around here, and it's complete BS. There are no "rights" to being top dps.

[Janhyua]

Uh huh...except she didn't say good dps, she said Why are you defending someone who's bias says that SAM should be the most powerful dps of any out there? Probably because you're bias as well with your lvl 70 SAM. You blatantly ignored her saying that as you claimed previously that no one is saying that, and then still refer to her in your latest reply.

It's not semantics, it's what is being said by her and others around here, and it's complete BS. There are no "rights" to being top dps.

because they offer no utility which is why they have to be the highest dps or they won't even make the cut to be in the raid and by i say highest they have to be higher then 300 to 400 dps then everyone else or they need a buff

[Draven]

because they offer no utility which is why they have to be the highest dps or they won't even make the cut to be in the raid and by i say highest they have to be higher then 300 to 400 dps then everyone else or they need a buff

Oh boy! More people who put words in my mouth, think I don't get their point, assume what I'm saying to someone else, and are cheerleading for SAMs!!

[Ryaz]

Uh huh...except she didn't say good dps, she said Why are you defending someone who's bias says that SAM should be the most powerful dps of any out there? Probably because you're bias as well with your lvl 70 SAM. You blatantly ignored her saying that as you claimed previously that no one is saying that, and then still refer to her in your latest reply.

It's not semantics, it's what is being said by her and others around here, and it's complete BS. There are no "rights" to being top dps.

I read strongest DPS as highest number wise, not highest overall, synergy factored in. Obviously, if she meant stronger than all the others even with their synergy, that's wrong.

Edit: Though, looking back, the same person you're quoting clarified in a later post that she meant strongest personal dps. And even said the dps should be equal to MNK + Brotherhood and Ninja + TA, not greater than them.