He literally just told you alot of people are playing SAM atm and then you restate that the top 100 has alot of SAM's..... come on man. Its hard to use top 100 as a base when alot of folk are trying out SAM atm.....Just on the top 100 list there's 82 SAM for the non-18 SAM on the list alone.
This includes all classes, not just Monk. In fact, there are NINE Monks for non-balance parsing. The highest of all the non-SAM classes there. There's only even two red mages there, so you can't even use the "the class is new so it's super popular" excuse.
Do not go down this rabbit hole.
I am not hating SAM for "no reason," I am being critical. There has never been such a lopsided class bias in rankings, whether it be top 100 or top 500.
I also just told him a lot of people are playing Red Mages, but there is only two on the entire list. Anyone can say there is a lot of anything. Both classes are new, but I don't see nearly as many RDM as SAM no matter where I look at the list.
Or are you implying there's double digit amounts of SAM for every one RDM?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.