Results 1 to 10 of 107

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Tracewood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Bast-- Ul'Dah.
    Posts
    556
    Character
    Eugene Tracewood
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 92
    People who keep suggesting a DPS meter really underestimate how many people will abuse it. Heck, check PF on the Raids and EX comments just to get an idea the kind of people that will use it to "justify" kicking someone or talking down to them.

    Remember "Skip Soar" ? Do you really want to give these people a tool that's ripe for abuse? How about the current meta for endgame, there are people excluding jobs. I get the good intention, but nothing good is going to come of it when given to people who want to abuse it.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    HoodRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    487
    Character
    Hood Rat
    World
    Brynhildr
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Tracewood View Post
    People who keep suggesting a DPS meter really underestimate how many people will abuse it. Heck, check PF on the Raids and EX comments just to get an idea the kind of people that will use it to "justify" kicking someone or talking down to them.
    Parsers have been in the game a long time, and most of the "abuse" isn't even from people using them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracewood View Post
    Remember "Skip Soar" ? Do you really want to give these people a tool that's ripe for abuse? How about the current meta for endgame, there are people excluding jobs. I get the good intention, but nothing good is going to come of it when given to people who want to abuse it.
    The amount of dps required to skip that first soar was doable at ilvl 230. The min ilvl for the instance is 250, yet many groups with 6 dps still couldn't skip. There was even a reddit page devoted to helping people skip soar. It had openers specifically designed to maximize dps on Zurvan for every class, but half the comments there were along the lines of, "stop crying and just learn how to do soar." The irony, of course, being that the people most likely to fail soar were the ones who couldn't do enough dps to skip it.
    (3)

  3. #3
    Player
    Akor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    144
    Character
    Akor Draconic
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Tracewood View Post
    People who keep suggesting a DPS meter really underestimate how many people will abuse it. Heck, check PF on the Raids and EX comments just to get an idea the kind of people that will use it to "justify" kicking someone or talking down to them.

    Remember "Skip Soar" ? Do you really want to give these people a tool that's ripe for abuse? How about the current meta for endgame, there are people excluding jobs. I get the good intention, but nothing good is going to come of it when given to people who want to abuse it.
    If ppl getting abused for doing bad dps it should be problem for banning them for WEEKS if its ingame dps meter or 3rd party. Its just that SE is to fucking lazy to thinking or change EULA. So yea it should make any difference if its in-build or not, abuse is abuse.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Mavrias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,071
    Character
    Jyn Willowsong
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Tracewood View Post
    People who keep suggesting a DPS meter really underestimate how many people will abuse it. Heck, check PF on the Raids and EX comments just to get an idea the kind of people that will use it to "justify" kicking someone or talking down to them.

    Remember "Skip Soar" ? Do you really want to give these people a tool that's ripe for abuse? How about the current meta for endgame, there are people excluding jobs. I get the good intention, but nothing good is going to come of it when given to people who want to abuse it.
    Requesting that your party has enough dps to skip soar isnt abuse. Especially when all that implies is "know your class well enough to execute a basic opener."
    (4)