Results -9 to 0 of 105

Dev. Posts

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    LillithaFenimore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    461
    Character
    Almalexia Nerevar
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Jennestia View Post
    Glad you're talking about someone else constantly referring to a 'he'.

    Also if you were actually talking about me and actually knew me, you'd know I'm the last person that agrees with "locking others out", or else I wouldn't support party play, let alone large party content (think about that, then think about wanting a "lock out".)

    There's a big difference between locking someone out of content and wanting content specifically made -- Scaling end-game content isn't as good as creating specific content for x party size because you basically kill the need or desire to do anything but the lowest/quickest option possible, because that's human nature -- People will want to do the most efficient and quickest route to the reward possible and that pretty much cheapens the overall content, so there's actually nothing wrong with creating the content mutually exclusive of each other while keeping a focus on 'full party' play, which is what other MMOs does because they know there's people playing in all level ranges and require different type of rewards and content as they go if you're not cannonballed to end-game.

    If creating only solo-duo/trio content is what's enjoyable, what's the problem with creating content specifically designed with that in mind while not destroying content designed for more people?



    Ok, the first portion I put in bold...no, not everyone wants the most efficient route due to human nature...many people here, myself included, unfortunately do not have the time that many like you have. Some people's lives get busy...real busy, and some like to relax via a video game. However, due to having little time to do full group content, some would prefer smaller group content so they still have the change to enjoy a game they are playing. There is no harm in that, especially if the reward IS scaled down % wise based on degree of difficulty and full party vs. light party. From what I have read, no one wants the content to be cheapened, and scaling it down for those who just can't afford the same type of time you do, isn't wrong. They have every right to enjoy a game they purchased to it's fullest just the same as someone else who prefers doing big group content.

    Secondly, from what I have read, I don't think people want the content to be destroyed for full party content. People just seem to want to have options available.
    (3)
    Last edited by LillithaFenimore; 12-14-2011 at 10:18 AM. Reason: forgetting to proofread....fun
    "I've never watched a nuclear explosion myself. That's a couple of degrees of stupid above my limit"- Old Man Harris