I know but that is not the point. The point is this thread is targeting people that disagree with it, It is even admitted in the first sentence. Some people have money to burn and don't care if something is overpriced, but that is not the point.



This forum is a snake pit to people who don't mind the cash shop. It's not far fetched to actively believe someone would think he's baiting when believe it or not- people can have a differing opinion. If all it took to "goad" you into saying he's baiting, then he probably had a good reason to have an inb4 disclaimer.
Last edited by Greedalox; 05-31-2017 at 08:21 AM.


negative people will be negative. Negative people will also seek out positively and try to snuff it out as soon as they can. Its how they work.


I don't know if OP has a history of trolling or anything, but there has been a lot of negative posts on the forum today about the cash shop. I see that in his first sentence... I don't see how that is targeting anyone, though. In any case, we won't change that they added these items this way. How about we do show some appreciation that we got them at all?![]()
I don't know if OP has a history of trolling or anything, but there has been a lot of negative posts on the forum today about the cash shop. I see that in his first sentence... I don't see how that is targeting anyone, though. In any case, we won't change that they added these itemsthis way. How about we do show some appreciation that we got them at all?I think it is an insult in general to make something of the likes of this tread, given the definition of what negative means and what it implies. Are you suggesting people do not have a right to voice out legitimate complaints over the mog station so they can keep over charging people? Why should I be happy about that? So when there is a group of people that examine prices more then others they are automatically bad and should not have a voice?neg·a·tive
(of a person, attitude, or situation) not desirable or optimistic.
Are you trying to imply we should mock those with money troubles and bow to the glory of the mog station when something new is added even if it is 20-30-40 dollars?What I consider more fair is something like 5$ per outfit, 10$ for account wide. 1$ per emote, 3$ for account wide. I would buy it for that, honestly. It's hard to resist it as it is because I reaaaally want all 3 of those beautiful 18$ outfits quite a bit. But I was below the poverty line for most my life so I really value my money much too much to frivelously spend it on 18$ virtual shirt and pants when there is so much more that is far more worth it.
I used to think COD DLC was overpriced to hell but it's a freaking full course meal compared to this one french fry. To hit closet to home, another SE game: FFXV, had its first DLC priced at 5$ for a new 2 hour dungeon and story, new playable character, new trial mode, new outfit, and new sword. 5$. And I still see people say THAT is overpriced. They'd probably have heatt failure if they say this blatant theivery at work.
But i am well aware they won't be changing it anytime soon. Not only would it be unfair to those who HAD bought it previously at the robber's price but they know they can get away with it so they'll keep at it.
https://youtu.be/WXA559KNopI?t=107
You are basically insulting people with threads worded like this who can't afford something, suggesting they can't be outspoken or be referred to with negative labels, acting like they shouldn't speak about things having too high of a cost. Just because some people are happy with the new items, does not give you a right to jam it in peoples faces that you can pay for something and they can't and suggesting they are "negative" for worrying about costs?
Free for all gouge fest will come back and bite the company in the long run some day.
Last edited by Ama_Hamada; 05-31-2017 at 11:03 AM.
They need to add the Zentetsuken emote into mog station



Originally Posted by SE
Posting content with the intention of criticizing either Square Enix staff or specific individuals.
http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...5382&tag=forum
Who's thread is breaking the ToS again? The one expressing gratitude to SE for adding items the OP likes to the mog station or the ones demonizing SE for adding said items to the cash shop?


Funny how you are breaking the same rule you claim Ama is doing.http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...5382&tag=forum
Who's thread is breaking the ToS again? The one expressing gratitude to SE for adding items the OP likes to the mog station or the ones demonizing SE for adding said items to the cash shop?Posting content with the intention of criticizing either Square Enix staff or specific individuals.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote




