A decade ago Blizzard was on the ball. Not sure that's relevant, but hey, I'm done. I don't see your point but feel free to feel neglected.I also said 9 weeks is a lot closer to a whole patch then a oh we had a bug and delayed a till Thursday. They have repeatedly in live letters mentioned a three month cycle. But one of the media tour videos said 4.0 would use 3 to 3.5 months. It is not written in stone/blood anywhere. Don't just come out and preen the whole three month thing. We had a patch that was 16 weeks but in theory fell in three months. I am sure that is not a translation error.
This is WoW cycle for the 2.X series.
2.0 December 5/06 2.1 May 22/07 2.2 Sept 25/07 2.3 Nov 13/07 2.4 Mar 25/08
16 instances 8 raids 63 weeks.
3.0 Oct 14/08 3.1 April 19/09 3.2 Aug 4/09 3.3 DEC 8/09
16 instances 10 raids 63 weeks
We got 18 instances over a much longer time. Raids are a little bit odd one boss isn't a raid how would you like to count the trials/raids?
But when 14 gets to 5 or 6 I will revisit how well they are doing in comparison. I posted 2 and 3 from WoW for you I consider a ARR a base game considering what 1.0 was. But if you want to consider ARR the first expansion the info still stands.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote

