Quote Originally Posted by Raikki View Post
Unfortunately that person doesn't quite know what they're talking about. It's possible that NTT could improve their internal routing in the future, but the location of the datacenters is set in stone now. The Colorado address you're seeing is a business address that NTT America's IP's are registered to, but is not where they're being used. This is abundantly clear if you simply look at their website:

http://www.us.ntt.com/en/services/da...center/us.html

They are not running a Colorado datacenter. They have facilities in California, Virginia, and Texas. No matter what conspiracies you want to entertain, even if you want to ignore the fact that the route terminates right after a clearly-labeled "sacramento, ca" hop, the fact is that the low pings northwest players are getting now would not even be possible if it were in Virginia or Texas no matter how good the routing was. You're being asked to believe the Earth might be flat.
Ah ok. That makes sense. It's nice to know that's why the geosites are saying that. I saw several Geosites putting it in Colorado when I punched in the IP address since I wasn't sure that scrmca was supposed to be brought out to be Sacramento due to the level 3 servers completely spelling out Montreal. I saw the tracert and now I realized that I am entering the NTT network in Palo Alto (plalca), then heading east to San Jose (snjsca) then north to Sacramento (scrmca). didn't think I would be going down there to enter the network. Thanks for the info as well! Now I'm able to see how it gets there.