
Plenty of games are now housed in Chicago (including League of Legends) which has a robust backbone. If we're talking connection quality there is little reason for it to be in Cali specifically.Because everyone equates geographically central with being network central -- and that's not true.
They could have stuck the servers somewhere in the middle of the country, but if that location has insufficient network connectivity, they would be in a physically central location, but still on the edge of the network.
California has a ton of backbone connections (not least thanks to all the big names in internet being there and wanting the best links to/from their HQ locations) both domestic and foreign (a lot of transoceanic cables come ashore there) so even though it's not geographicallycentral, it's probably closer to the network center.

Hey I don't know -- I'm just theorizing as to their decision process (wihch I don't know anythign about) and trying to figure out why they picked Cali. Then again, they picked Germany for EU which was a lovely choice as well (especially when Telia has their unlocatable network problems again and half of Europe gets random lagspikes)so yeah ... ultimately I guess a manager set a budget and the network guys had to stick to that to make their choices ..
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

