OK, I'm going to throw into the morality debate again. I'm going to hide-box it for discretion, however, so there's no need for the "stop posting walls of text."
Going to war should never be done lightly, but this war was foisted on us by a madman. That should not be forgot.
If you would ask what the Scions would do to those who took up arms in self-defense, ask the same of the Garleans. People lose non-combatant status when they take up arms and try to kill you; if they violently disagree with your course of action and attempt to kill you, it's do or die. Which would you choose?
Nobody said being a hero was fun or easy or clean, but there are lines we do not cross. Self-aware "heroes" do not proclaim themselves as such; they do what is necessary with minimal casualties, no more. However, there is a very clear distinction between the heroes and the villains if you look closely enough.
The Garleans will stop at nothing to bring the world to heel. They attempt to achieve peace through tyranny, and those who would forsake liberty for security deserve neither.
We, the Scions at least, will sacrifice everything - our friendships, our innocence, and even our very lives - to prevent that, because freedom is the right of all sentient beings.
Thancred said it best: "You make your choice and live with the consequences." We could choose not to attack, to engage Garlemald in a preemptive counterattack for the retaliation we know is coming for Baelsar's Wall. They could also choose not to attack, and simply relinquish control of Gyr Abania and/or Doma. They could have chosen not to attack and conquer either region at all, which to our knowledge was completely unprovoked. They made their choices, and now we must make some as well - but always keep that line in mind, and never cross it.
I acknowledge that being a "hero" sometimes means doing unheroic things. Suffice to say there is a reason I play the "vigilante class."
"They were abused before magitek" doesn't justify Garlemald's actions - that was 50+ years ago, and to our knowledge none of the territories they've put to heel (and we are subsequently going to try and liberate) had anything to do with that. "Ala Mhigo deserved it for their belligerency" - nobody deserves what happened to them, and what about Doma? "They're trying to save the world in their own extreme way;" sure they are, but it just so happens Garlemald is the only nation that benefits from that course. Everyone else is killed or put to heel. Even if we agreed with their genocidal plans, Garlemald would still throw their war machine at us to conquer Eorzea - it's what they do, not purely an act of well-intentioned extremism or self-defense. "You can't apply conventional morality to fantasy characters" - in some cases, sure, but by and large XIV runs on conventional morality, portraying kindness and self-sacrifice as good things (the latter gets to be excessive sometimes, but I digress), and selfishness and cruelty as bad things. The Stormblood site itself calls the Garleans "curs;" obviously they are not meant to be viewed in a positive light overall.
Revolutions, to me, sounds like a denunciation of the Garlean method, as well as a warning to the Eorzeans not to lose themselves and be blinded by their "justice" during the quest to liberate the two nations. A reminder not to cross the line and allow vengeance to cloud our minds, or try and use the Garleans' actions as an excuse to commit war crimes against them. (Or just that sort of thing in general, you know?)
That's what separates us from the Garleans. There is a line that we will not cross, while they have no compunctions about doing so.
Really, besides Zenos, the character that intrigues me most is Fordola. As someone split between the two sides yet accepted by neither, I'm very interested to see what she does. She also seems to be quite the formidable opponent - I hope we get to test our mettle against her.
I'd wager Revolutions will indeed play against Zenos, if he is the final boss of the 4.x story arc. (Nidhogg, despite not being finished until 3.3, was the main antagonist and final boss from very late 2.3 until 3.3. Zenos... well, it remains to be seen if he survives 4.0, or if our final confrontation with him is at the end of 4.0. Assuming we ever engage him personally, though I get the feeling that's inevitable.)
Need to stop wasting Orbs trying to get Effie... especially if swimsuit Lucina is a real thing...
... aaaaand rambling over.
P.S. I decided I'm gonna do 4.0 in my now-iconic red plate mail. I want them to come for me.