Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Zojha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    3,565
    Character
    Lodestone Bait
    World
    Pandaemonium
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 1
    Quote Originally Posted by Korihu View Post
    [...] which is not how they should work rankings.
    If they did rankings right, you'd need a 51+% winrate to climb and would fall at 49-%. There would be no minimum rank protection, no systematical disparity between rating gained and lost and no promotion matches - You're in if you got the rating, you're out if you lose it. And matchmaking would be done by searching for people of your rating +-50, not look across tiers.

    That's what ranked would look like if they were serious about it. They aren't. Ranked is a joke played on people who miss the punchline in their fervent desire to take it serious.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Korihu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    309
    Character
    Korihu Yanhu
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Zojha View Post
    If they did rankings right, you'd need a 51+% winrate to climb and would fall at 49-%. There would be no minimum rank protection, no systematical disparity between rating gained and lost and no promotion matches - You're in if you got the rating, you're out if you lose it. And matchmaking would be done by searching for people of your rating +-50, not look across tiers.

    That's what ranked would look like if they were serious about it. They aren't. Ranked is a joke played on people who miss the punchline in their fervent desire to take it serious.
    I agree with everything, however the matchmaking being tier based is unavoidable with the size of our community. It already took ages to find games in Season 1 when matchmaking was +1 and -1 from your tier.
    (0)