Thread: [Spoiler] Support Papalymo for 4.0!

Originally Posted by Vexander

However, Papalymo's death doesn't signify anything that important to the narrative or the plot. Papalymo's death pales in comparison. Its wasted potential. He wasn't developed enough, and we didn't have enough investment in him emotionally to be strongly affected by his death.

And THIS is what I am talking about. In 1.0 he seemed to have more of a role. More story and participation that was oddly lost when we got to 2.0. Now its like he finally has something going and then instantly is "gone"
Think about it. He KNEW that wasnt Yda. He also knew he was helping Lyse with the Ala Mihgo stuff. yet we get no details on this or possibly him helping her even more.

Now for everyone who says "Let the people stay dead". If that was the case. Everyone shouldve stayed dead from the end of 1.0. =p

Hell, with everyone else being allowed to "come back" somehow if they were part of the main cast. I just felt Papalymo should be allowed the same chance here.

Originally Posted by Mysticales

And THIS is what I am talking about. In 1.0 he seemed to have more of a role. More story and participation that was oddly lost when we got to 2.0. Now its like he finally has something going and then instantly is "gone"
Think about it. He KNEW that wasnt Yda. He also knew he was helping Lyse with the Ala Mihgo stuff. yet we get no details on this or possibly him helping her even more.

Now for everyone who says "Let the people stay dead". If that was the case. Everyone shouldve stayed dead from the end of 1.0. =p

Hell, with everyone else being allowed to "come back" somehow if they were part of the main cast. I just felt Papalymo should be allowed the same chance here.

I'm pretty sure there's a fallacy involved in "If Papalymo can't come back, everyone should have died in the Calamity". Think you might be a little attached.

He's already dead. Undoing it now would be a Nanamo situation all over again. It'd make the whole sacrifice he did completely worthless, make what it represents worthless, and throw one hell of a spanner into Lyse's entire motive. And what for? Stockholm Syndrome? Just let him die, geez.

Revive Papalymo? are you kidding me?

Kill Lyse, or Thancred, That'll do too.

Originally Posted by NaesakiAshwell

So many people wanting the Scions to be killed off, such savagery :c

Right?

I'm less on the "Let's kill Scions" train and more "If you killed it, let it stay dead" train.

Originally Posted by Dualgunner

Right?

I'm less on the "Let's kill Scions" train and more "If you killed it, let it stay dead" train.

Same, though Thancred and Lyse I can do without.

Originally Posted by Kallera

Same, though Thancred and Lyse I can do without.

I'm biased but I love Thancred (and want his hair) can we keep him?

I also like how Thancred calls us out on our shit meddling in wars and politics that shouldn't concern us

Originally Posted by Dualgunner

I'm biased but I love Thancred (and want his hair) can we keep him?

I also like how Thancred calls us out on our shit meddling in wars and politics that shouldn't concern us

Well, I'm open to Lyse biting the dust, but sure, we agree on the important part anyway.

Thancred is like the most badass character of the scions and should not die. And minfillia may be alive but she is useless now and probably will not be in 4.0-5.0 at all.