Dam. meter

[Oscura]

Honestly I would love if they'd stop their constant obsession with DPS checks if they don't want parsing to be part of their game. Why focus so heavily on having a bottom line for damage and then tell your players simultaneously to never talk about damage numbers in detail?

T7 was a good example of a turn that mostly just required doing mechanics and "just getting a clear." I'd like to see more turns like that.

[akaneakki]

--or even the majority-- would be toxic with the parsers.

Because it's pretty rare. I can go in a duty finder where i tell a blm to use fire 2 on aoe, then replies it's his game and I cant tell him how to play.
I have soo many screenshots of this. In fact ill take ss from now on, with people harrasing with parser vs without.

[Dualgunner]

Because it's pretty rare. I can go in a duty finder where i tell a blm to use fire 2 on aoe, then replies it's his game and I cant tell him how to play.
I have soo many screenshots of this. In fact ill take ss from now on, with people harrasing with parser vs without.

The same issue applies here: that's still really just an anecdote. If someone collected actual numbers on this subject somehow and the numbers came out as the overwhelming majority of people who used parsers were toxic, it'd be one thing. If the overwhelming majority were "It's my sub" players, then it'd be another (and if it were both then this really is a polar game).