Results 1 to 10 of 43

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    bswpayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,918
    Character
    Nic Pay
    World
    Exodus
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Sqwall View Post
    I have been playing paladin since 2.0. At first I felt it was the best tank due to the mitigation it offered. I really had the job down really well
    Hmm if your talkin about dungeons Ive never had someone say anything to me about being pali.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    whiteblade89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    374
    Character
    Auron Vale
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by bswpayton View Post
    Hmm if your talkin about dungeons Ive never had someone say anything to me about being pali.
    I have a feeling OP was referring more to raiding and trials rather than dungeons. Every class is viable in dungeons and can clear easily. I think a minority portion of the community prefers not to have them in harder content like primals and raids because of the lack of dps that PLD has. I can't confirm this because Ive never run into groups who turn PLD's away. Its no secret that they're the lowest damage of the three tanks. Then again, I'm not in the "hardcore" community. I join a lot of pf groups to farm primals and I don't do savage raids. But in the hardcore raiding community, they probably suffer more for the aforementioned lack of dps.
    (1)
    Last edited by whiteblade89; 04-15-2017 at 04:05 AM.

  3. #3
    Player
    ADVSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    2,397
    Character
    Advent Shadowsoul
    World
    Zalera
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteblade89 View Post
    I have a feeling OP was referring more to raiding and trials rather than dungeons. Every class is viable in dungeons and can clear easily. I think a minority portion of the community prefers not to have them in harder content like primals and raids because of the lack of dps that PLD has. I can't confirm this because Ive never run into groups who turn PLD's away. Its no secret that they're the lowest damage of the three tanks. Then again, I'm not in the "hardcore" community. I join a lot of pf groups to farm primals and I don't do savage raids. But in the hardcore raiding community, they probably suffer more for the aforementioned lack of dps.
    its still vaguely noticible in dungeons, but not by too much, i still think its unfair thay got little easy method to dps pack mobs, but its not going to make or break a df, however all of these points above:
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyth View Post
    I think there are two issues here, which are separate from each other. The first is playstyle, and the second is raid functionality.

    PLD's playstyle is a function of several factors. It forms the foundation of our present tanking model. PLD's toolkit contains several skills that are essential for every tank (such as Provoke). It's also generally the first tanking experience that players are exposed to. As a result, every other tank job's identity is constructed by creating flavour differences between it's own toolkit and that of PLD's. The flipside is that PLD tends not to have a distinct identity of its own.

    This is also a function of the lore behind the job. I think that a lot of people expect PLD to function as some sort of holy knight, in the same vein as the Ishgardian knights, Cecil from FF4, or Agrias/Orlandu from FFT. However, that was the route that DRK took, functioning as a knight-errant who uses a mix of spells and swordplay to fight corruption. PLDs are derived from bodyguards to the sultanate. The combat set is not designed to be flashy. Their job is to intercept blows and rout out intruders. If you want to give PLD an identity, you need to expand on these points.

    The elements are there, for the most part. If you play PLD in PvP (where it's arguably the strongest tank choice), it not only has an identity, but it feels fun to play. It's strength doesn't come out of its mitigation (people are usually after softer targets), but instead from your ability to rescue teammates from trouble and interfere with your opponents attacks. I suppose another factor at work here is that you have more time to make use of skills like Clemency and Stoneskin, while the cast times attached to these skills in PvE often are prohibitive.

    While PLD's playstyle determines whether people enjoy playing it, raid functionality influences what job you end up to bringing to raid. This is where issues like damage output, raid buffs, and mitigation come into play. This is a much bigger problem. Not everyone needs to like PLD. But everyone who likes playing PLD should be capable of raiding on it, without feeling like they have to switch. Likewise, people who flat out dislike PLD's playstyle shouldn't feel like they're forced on to the job to meet the mitigation requirements of a fight.

    I can understand that people may feel that making PLD stronger defensively and weaker offensively may give it a better sense of identity, but this really isn't the case. It just leads to either an underpowered or an overpowered job that still lacks an identity.
    I have to agree with Lyth this statement is spot on. I am okay with pld/drk dealing less damage, but would it hurt for them to offer some kind of damage buff for overall raid comps? What is most unfair for pld, identity exvluded, is how those few factors make it much less desirable than they other two which sucks that it comes down to sacrificing the weak turtle tank identity, but maybe a little of that would have to be sacrificed to give it a chance, not to be dropped
    (0)
    Last edited by ADVSS; 04-15-2017 at 06:35 AM.