Suggestion: When Someone Doesn't Meet Requirements of a Duty, Can it PLEASE Say WHO?

[Kalsoa]

Just got a party finder group together for some Ex clears, try to queue, says someone doesn't meet the requirements. I ask around, no one will fess up that they don't have the duty unlocked, party falls apart, the end. Sooooo frustrating. Can we please make it so it at least tells the leader of the group who doesn't have the duty unlocked or doesn't meet the ilvl requirements? This seems like an easy way to troll.

And FYI, it was for Bismarck Ex, so ilvl shouldn't have been an issue unless someone was purposely trolling.

[BigRed5392]

snip.

thread on this already.

[dragonseth07]

thread on this already.

This is a totally different issue from raising DF requirements, actually.

On that note, I agree. I've had PF's fall apart for the same reason.

[ErryK]

I thought it always said who it was who doesn't have access to the duty? I know you can ignore iLv with a full party but if you queue with a 7/8 party, it will still enforce iLv. But as far as my experience goes, it should tell you who it is.

[lvlagmarink]

This should be a thing.. when I join coil for khloe.. there is almost always that someone who doesnt meet the requirement by either not unlocking it or getting penalty from leaving duty.. it wasnt intended for them to troll the party, but they are mostly clueless that it's them being the troublemakers while the party doesnt get to know who's the troublemaker is..

[Ama_Hamada]

Yes the reason people do not speak up because they do not know. It needs to tell who it is and I do not get why it doesn't

[DaikiKiyoshi]

Fully support this. I've had PF's fall apart for the same reason and yeah, sometimes they may not even know it's them. This would help everyone involved.

[CaptainLagbeard]

I don't know if they're talking about ilvl requirements and such, but mostly not having the specific duty unlocked... But overall, I do think it should tell who it is and what requirements they don't meet.

[Vaer]

If worse comes to worse I would just let the group know that you are going to start kicking and attempting to queue until it goes through and invite everyone back /put PF back up when it does and you find out who is holding it up. That might be enough for the troll to leave on their own if they were doing it on purpose. Wouldn't work very well for xserver but.. yeah.

More clarity on an active DF lockout, perhaps a debuff.

[Blueyes]

For the specific party member that does not meet the requirements there should be an error notification that pops up when attempting to queue for the instance. If someone truly doesn't know if they meet the requirements you can ask if anyone gets an error message.