Quote Originally Posted by lackofwords View Post
You didn't read it all. I'm not refuting the fact. Refuting your usage of the fact.

I don't know how much more can I clarify how you're mixing your opinions into facts.

Here is another example;
FFXIV had plans to charge us for $12.99. That's a fact.
Using your reasoning but just changing the subject matter;

Would you agree on that?
Would you agree on the OPINION that since FFXIV had plans to be charged at $12.99 that it SHOULD remain at $12.99.

Using the fact, to justify the opinion, that is exactly what you are saying with this
We are talking about exceptions, and rules here.

Exception: this game had a poor release due to some really bad game designs.

The company is desperately attempting to salvage the game. SE feels that failing this title would result in a critical blow to the franchise's name. My personal stance on payment has absolutely nothing to do with this topic.

I challenge you to please quote me, at least once, in the thread where I said I want and need other final fantasy races in this game.

You cannot. I merely stated that there has been precedence. You then mention branding, and how they do not include races as a method of branding a new final fantasy. I then proceeded to remind you that XIV races are not original, and they were ripped from XI.

The only opinion I have ever offered was "that is a weak excuse"; in regard to peoples' reasoning that this game could not see races from other games within the series because they are offline rpgs.