Results -9 to 0 of 191

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    SokiYagami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,272
    Character
    Soki Yagami
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Serilda View Post
    Current system: If you want to keep glamouring something, you can't use it for seals or desynthesis without reobtaining it.
    New system as proposed by the community: If you want to keep glamouring something, you can't use it for seals or desynthesis without reobtaining it.
    Your version: You should be able to keep glamouring something and use it for seals or desynthesis without reobtaining it.

    You're asking for more than we are, so the request is less likely to be approved. That's all there is to it. Of course I'd like to be able to use the item for a bunch of different things and keep it for glamour too, but I don't want to push our luck here. I want the log first and foremost; extra benefits are a distant bonus.
    Current system: I glamour gear A onto gear B, gear A will be binded to me so I can't sell it on MB, I can still desync/hand in/vendor gear A. After I desync/hand in/vendor gear A, I can't glamour it again.

    My version: I add gear A to glamour log, gear A will be binded to me so I can't sell it on MB, I can still desync/hand in/vendor gear A. After I desync/hand in/vendor gear A, I can glamour it again... because that's the whole point of a glamour log?



    Quote Originally Posted by SokiYagami View Post
    I'll explain why the item being destroyed is a bad idea. Say you already have an alex weapon and you're working on a relic for glamour. So if you want to glamour stage X of relic onto your alex weapon, it will destroy your relic weapon in the process of adding it to the glamour log. Then what happen when the next stage of relic update is release? Are you going to work on the relic from scratch again? Granted things are better now that replica relic is a thing, but do note that it only gives you up to stage X-1 of the relic. So what's next? You're going to wait til the next relic update patch to be release before you will glamour it? Doesn't that sound ridiculous?
    Quote Originally Posted by SokiYagami View Post
    If it's the latter than the benefit from allowing players to hand-in/vendor the glamour gear after adding it to the log is so minuscule that it barely make any difference.
    I explain why it's a bad idea for the item to be destroyed when added to log. I also mentioned that letting players to desync/hand in the items barely make any difference. Think about it honestly, because:

    A) We can already glamour then desync/hand in the gear now, so the proposed system I suggested just changed it to adding to the log first, no additional work (besides the log itself) is required.

    B) Practically speaking, if you got the gear for glamour, what's the point of getting it again when you already add it to the log? If you got the gear for desync/hand in, you will still be getting it again anyway regardless if we have the glamour log or not.

    C) HW is already raining us with seals and gils. This one time surged in seals/vendor gils when you first add the item to the glamour log won't lead to Ragnarok seriously...

    D) If the developer team have to account for every new item added (and one time loop through for existing item) so upgradeable gear (relic/tome gear) have to be filter as a non-destroyedable item upon adding onto the log, that's additional workload as compared to what I suggested no matter how you slice it. If every item is destroyed upon adding it to the glamour log, please refer to above for why it's a bad reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by Serilda View Post
    New system as proposed by the community:
    And lastly... I'm not sure if I missed reading something or what, but I'm pretty sure that's an overstatement. Most people just agree on wanting a glamour log, barely anyone voiced about agreeing/disagreeing on the destruction of item upon adding to glamour log besides ShinMetsu, Zojha, Dusty and the both of us at time of writing.
    (2)
    Last edited by SokiYagami; 03-16-2017 at 02:58 AM.

Tags for this Thread