Results -9 to 0 of 191

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Wildsprite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,299
    Character
    Moonfrost Hailstorm
    World
    Zalera
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by SokiYagami View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ShinMetsu View Post
    There is literally no bloody reason for the gear to be destroyed when you add it to the glamour log. Just bind the gear to the character (like how's it's done when you glamour a piece of new gear) and call it a day. Hell, ideally you shouldn't even need to do it manually. The system should auto add it into the log the moment you pick up a piece of gear with a new model.

    Seriously people, stop making things more complicated than required... This shit (destruction of gear when adding to glamour log) always trigger me so hard when I see one...
    I think they should do it like GW2 where you can choose to add it to the log and then it becomes permanently bound to you, or you put it on and it does. there are things that are destroyed upon use that are glamour in GW2 but they are only glamour, no stats on them at all. they are usually included with sets that actually have stats on them.
    the idea that you should need to destroy it is silly, it would remove some gear that is perfectly decent from being used again

    Quote Originally Posted by Headhunters View Post
    useless feature like all glamour. they should focus on other stuffs.
    your oppinion on this is noted, many(probably most) disagree with you

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackbird1 View Post
    i mean it would save us space in bags if we could just call up a log of what we want to glamour over a certain item possible retainer space as well i'am a glamourmonger myself but i'd rather them deal with important issues first like denying males bunny suit or whatever stupid nonsense they are asking for that is gender locked like improving msq stuff, raids, trials, duties... worry about small things later
    I think you are vastly outnumbered by those of us who do not think this is a small thing, in the end it is the devlopers who have to decide how big this would be. personally I see it as an oppertunity for 2 things. getting people to re-run older content and getting more subs due to this being an attractive feature
    (5)
    Last edited by Wildsprite; 03-19-2017 at 06:32 PM.

Tags for this Thread