As long as it is not against the rules you can call it how you want. For me it is a valid reason, for you not easy as pie.That is a failure of logic. Inaction does not equate to validation. It is a reason that doesn't carry much consequence in practice, but that lack of consequence does not express validation of that reason by Square Enix in and of itself. That the end result from the point of view of the players for both inaction and validation is the same can make it appear that it does. The line the company tows here is that play style differences are not a significant enough event to warrant resources spent on moderating party kick situations that involve them beyond stating that position. Simply, Square Enix says that they do not take sides in such conflicts which results in the exact same outcome as if they were to side with the kickers, so it appears that they are siding with the kickers when they aren't actually explicitly doing so.![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.