Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    LunaFaye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,037
    Character
    Luna Faye
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Weaver Lv 51
    Quote Originally Posted by Canadane View Post
    People were selling premium weddings ingame without issue, from what I remember.
    not fully correct. While it was a trend to sell these items via PF (couldn't list them on the MB, which is the case for most items via mogstation) for the first couple of weeks, after a while it was well known that this is against ToS, just like the selling of houses at the moment. Obviously that works only if others report that kind of behavior, but I would be very careful with reselling items via PF that are not meant to be sold.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    AnimaAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,344
    Character
    Cynric Zerr
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaFaye View Post
    not fully correct. While it was a trend to sell these items via PF (couldn't list them on the MB, which is the case for most items via mogstation) for the first couple of weeks, after a while it was well known that this is against ToS, just like the selling of houses at the moment. Obviously that works only if others report that kind of behavior, but I would be very careful with reselling items via PF that are not meant to be sold.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, the promise wristlets were designed to be tradable so that one person would be able to purchase a pair of wristlets and gift one to their partner.

    While the trading and selling of these items for gil is not against the terms of service, in the event this type of trend continues and topics continue to arise regarding whether or not this is considered real-money trading, we will have no choice but to change the design of this system. Therefore we would like players to stop selling and trading the bracelets for gil so that they can continue to be used for their intended purpose.

    It's all in technicalities, unless they changed their stance on this it clearly states it is not against ToS. But since they haven't said anything since that I am aware of its still ok. It's just frowned upon.
    (0)