Agreed on the seer's cowl.. it's just.. an eyesore at this point yet it's the only mask + cowl combo we have currently in the game. D:
During the Live Letter, they said glamours would only be added to the mogstation if people would show enough support to buy said items. Also it's still a factor it could be added in game as a quest reward. Please spread the word and like the thread for more Garlean and Ascian themed/inspired armors for players to wear!
For the sooner i'd say go loot the Darklight caster lvl 70 and the later go do the MSQ lvl 48 or so.
Yesssss. This has my full support! I for one would appreciate seeing my fellow RPers able to dress how they'd like. More glamour options is never a bad thing.
Except Darklight gear doesn't exactly come close enough. There is no mask with the darklight hoods and seer's cowl is an ugly excuse for being the only cowl with a mask that players are able to wear.
Except we'll be able to glamour into the Heavensward Knights attire/weapons fairly soon. They were the staple enemy of the 3.0 MSQ. Regardless of what people say of them being misguided, there were some in the Heavensward that would have likely accepted and jumped at the chance to become stronger no matter the cost. Any NPC we must defeat is considered a villain.
By that logic Hoary Boulder and raubahn are villains. Just sayin'
I agree with those in this thread that wants more standard cowl/mask combinations. Those are always welcome.
And sure, once we are completely done with ascians, i will agree to get their armor. Completely done. Killed em all off. Defeated zodiark.
The heavensward are done. They are all gone and wont return. Same cant be said for ascians. In a way, the WoL is the new heavensward being a close friend of the new leader and protector of the city, even going so far as to represent Ishgard at the grand melee.
Last edited by Enur; 02-21-2017 at 04:20 AM.
Sure he don't mean gears from the chinese cash shop?During the Live Letter, they said glamours would only be added to the mogstation if people would show enough support to buy said items. Also it's still a factor it could be added in game as a quest reward. Please spread the word and like the thread for more Garlean and Ascian themed/inspired armors for players to wear!
They are dead. Ascians are still alive (or how much an Ascian can be alive)Except we'll be able to glamour into the Heavensward Knights attire/weapons fairly soon. They were the staple enemy of the 3.0 MSQ. Regardless of what people say of them being misguided, there were some in the Heavensward that would have likely accepted and jumped at the chance to become stronger no matter the cost. Any NPC we must defeat is considered a villain.
Last edited by Felis; 02-21-2017 at 04:31 AM.
When I wrote that I intended it to be meant as defeated, dead, permanently gone. I had no idea someone would take it as full term for all NPC's.
No he didn't specifically state chinese case shop. His statement was in response to adding the Krile outfit for player glamour.
There are a lot of NPC's that are dead and or considered to be in a state of such and we have their NPC armors. You can't really use the "They're not dead so you can't have it." excuse. We also still have NPC's that are alive and yet their armor is available for players to wear.
It shouldn't matter in this case if an NPC - whether villain or hero, is dead or alive for us to be able to obtain and wear their armor. The argument has been made so many times in this discussion but why should it matter if we can wear villain armor or not when we have Thancred and Y'shtola's 3.x Outfits and they aren't dead yet? why should it matter if they're a villain vs a hero NPC?
We can already achieve a Warrior of Darkness group look, we can already make our characters to look like any NPC, whether hero or villain, aside from those with unique models.
Explain to me why adding more villain themed armor should matter when we can recreate the NPC's via the character creator and in some cases obtain the armor as well to complete the look? Give me one good reason other than what has already been stated.
Last edited by Grimmel; 02-21-2017 at 05:30 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.