[Dev Request] How about Ascian/Garlean Armor?

[Enur]

I am against telling people to ignore those that disagree with their opinion

As to the topic at hand:

I dont want gear that breaks the lore. (Before you shout YOKAI WAS A THING, yes it was. I realise it. I dont agree it should have been, but i have come to the conclusion that events and similar simply cant be accounted for.)

Lorewise there is a very good reason you shouldnt get ascian armor. They are the villains. And i dont like people dressing like the big bad guys as if they were mere halloween costumes. Would make the ascians lose what little credibility they have left.

As to Garlean armor? Same reason as above. Also the average garlean legatus would get shot at sight if seen within your average city state.


All of this is my opinion. Take it as you wish.

[Lone-wolfe-02]

[I] Lorewise there is a very good reason you shouldnt get ascian armor. They are the villains. And i dont like people dressing like the big bad guys as if they were mere halloween costumes. Would make the ascians lose what little credibility they have left.

As to Garlean armor? Same reason as above. Also the average garlean legatus would get shot at sight if seen within your average city state.

Yet you can get Odins armor and nobody bats an eye.

[Grimmel]

Yet you can get Odins armor and nobody bats an eye.

That is correct. And given that Odin's story was left open after the conclusion of his trial battle, he may very well become a part of the MSQ someday.